Archive for December, 2006

I’m a Wiggly Worm.. Yippee!

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

Update 12/23: I am devo :-(  

Now that my TTLB Blogosphere Ecosystem problems are resolved (they vanished when I switched to my new host.. guess I know the source of the problem now), I have started my climb out of the primordial ooze.

As of today, I am a Wiggly Worm. I don’t know what to say. There are so many people I need to thank. 

I’d like to thank my dad for teaching me that sometimes you need to crawl through dirt to get ahead; mom for always believing I could be more than an Insignificant Microbe or Multicellular Microorganism; all the big people who have supported and linked to me; and most of all, each and every one of you who have visited and contributed to my continuing evolution.

Before I get the hook (hmmm… Wiggly Worms probably shouldn’t be mentioning hooks), a shameless plug for my next venture. With your support, I can realize my dream of someday being a Crunchy Crustacean.  Please give your links generously… help me to a better life with a hard shell.

Thank you for your support.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Hey Sandy, Thanks a Bunch!

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

It was only THE most important investigation in our lifetime, or so we were told.

The 9/11 Commission was going to look at ALL of the available documentation, interview everyone who might provide any insight, and tell the American people how we reached a point where Islamic Fascists knocked down the World Trade Center Towers, crashed a jet into the Pentagon, and brought down another in Pennsylvania that was likely headed for the Capitol, killing thousands of people (our friends, our family, our neighbors). Then they were going to tell us how we go about preventing this from ever happening again.

So.. what does good citizen Sandy Berger do, either on his own or at the direction of his spiritual guides — the Clintons?  Why good ole’ Sandy covers his butt with classified documents which very likely had information that would have been 1) very helpful to the commission and 2) very embarrassing to the Clinton administration.

FoxNews December 21, 2006: President Clinton’s national security adviser removed classified documents from the National Archives, hid them under a construction trailer and later tried to find the trash collector to retrieve them, the agency’s internal watchdog said Wednesday.

If, as his attorney claims, this information is available elsewhere, why go through the trouble of stealing every single copy from the National Archives and destroying them.  Seems like quite a risk to take for something that is available elsewhere.

FoxNews December 21, 2006: Berger’s lawyer, Lanny Breuer, said in a statement that the contents of all the documents exist today and were made available to the commission.

Berger pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents. He was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.

Three years!!?? How about for-e-ver!

From FoxNews April 3, 2005: under a plea agreement that [U.S. Magistrate Deborah] Robinson must accept, instead of jail, Berger would pay a … fine, surrender his security clearance for three years and cooperate with investigators.

So how about that cooperation Sandy? You know what was in those documents. You already pleaded guilty, so you can’t be prosecuted for this crime again. How about coming clean and telling the American people what was so important in those documents that they had to be destroyed? Or would that hurt President Clinton’s precious legacy or Senator Clinton’s chances for ascension to the presidency in 2008?

So far, cooperation seems to be in the form of denying there was anything criminal in his actions, denying the documents were originals, denying there is anything that is not already available elsewhere…  In other words, Sandy Berger took the extreme step of stealing and destroying classified documents for no reason at all.. a whim perhaps, just something he felt like doing that night…

He said his motivation was to help himself and others prepare for their appearance before the commission probing the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

OK… so you’re Sandy Berger and you want to “prepare” yourself and others for a commission appearance, what do you do?  Clearly the right thing to do is to STEAL the necessary CLASSIFIED documents and then destroy them before you even share them with the other folks you are trying to help prepare for the commission hearing. That makes perfect sense; why would anyone ever question that?

FoxNews April 3, 2005: But still missing are drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration’s response to a failed terror plot to blow up the Los Angeles International Airport during December 1999, otherwise known as “the Millennium plot.”

One source told FOX News that the report was critical of how the Clinton administration handled Al Qaeda threats to the U.S. homeland and that the missing report made security recommendations that were never implemented.

Wouldn’t want to share anything critical of the Clinton administration with the commission… even if it might be a key to learning from past mistakes to prevent future disasters.

Face it, the Clinton administration was one of the most corrupt in history and they are still screwing the American people even after they are out of office. Unlike the disappearing/reappearing documents of Hillary Clinton, Sandy Berger has managed to wipe out any trace of something, who knows what, that was clearly important enough to Berger and the Clintons that he was willing to risk jail time to make sure they were destroyed.

12/22 Update from the Washington Times (via Gina Cobb):

The outgoing chairman of the House Government Reform Committee says questions remain about former National Security Adviser Samuel R. Berger’s removal of classified documents from the National Archives and pledged yesterday to get the answers.
    “I don’t care if it’s Sandy Berger or Warren Burger or Veggie Burger who walked off with these documents,” said Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, Virginia Republican. “It’s the lax controls that permitted such a theft; it’s the way it was handled internally at the Archives and then by [the Justice Department] that is of grave concern.”

I like that line :-)

 ”At best, Berger’s actions portray a disturbing breach of trust and protocol,” Mr. Davis said. “At worst, however, Berger’s actions suggest an intentional effort to keep critical information away from the 9/11 commission and the American public.
    ”Our work has not concluded, and we fully expect to continue our oversight efforts with respect to this matter,” he said.

Good! We need to know exactly what the Clinton administration is hiding here. It is shameful that they are putting their personal interests and the “Clinton legacy” ahead of national security… I’m not sure whether this is surprising or expected, but I thought everything changed on 9/11… guess not.

Let’s see if the new Democrat chair of the committee is as interested in finding the truth as Davis.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Dateline: 2060

Wednesday, December 20th, 2006

Saw this article linked over at Wake Up America and it got me thinkin’ (always a good read over in spree-land), what will be the hot civil rights topics of the day?

If you haven’t read the article, some excerpts for context: 

Robots and machines are now classed as inanimate objects without rights or duties but if artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous, the report argues, there may be calls for humans’ rights to be extended to them.

It is also logical that such rights are meted out with citizens’ duties, including voting, paying tax and compulsory military service.

“If granted full rights, states will be obligated to provide full social benefits to them including income support, housing and possibly robo-healthcare to fix the machines over time,”

Think of the possible scenarios we will face as a society.

  • Should robot “children” be allowed to play sports alongside carbon-based children? If the robot child is better at baseball than your kid (a very likely scenario, I’ve seen your kid play… just kidding), will your kid ride the bench, or maybe not make the team at all?
  • Will there be robot schools that are segregated from carbon-unit schools, or will their need to be forced integration? Will the robot schools be so much more advanced that your kid has no chance to excel?
  • How about jobs? Do the robots displace the humans if they perform the work better or will there be forced quotas of humans in the workplace?

And of course, the topic that may divide our country on emotional lines so inflammatory that friends would avoid the topic at the dinner tabe for fear of destroying a friendship: Gravatar 

  • When, during manufacturing, does a potential robot actually become a robot and have rights? How late in the process can we legally abort the assembly and toss the parts in a recycle bin? Does “life” begin at concept? Design? Assembly? Testing? Post-production? The ACLU would clearly need to weigh in on this critical issue.

Ah, what a Utopia it will be…

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

The Front

Wednesday, December 20th, 2006

Something that has helped provide a basic understand of whether we are winning or losing wars in the past: The Front.  In its simplest form, move the Front forward and you are winning, give up ground and you are losing. One of the problems with understanding the “War on Terror” is defining a front for the American people to root for; after all, we are a nation that likes to win and when we are told we are not winning, even if we are not losing, we are just not happy. Without a front to define how well we are doing, without a geographical enemy to declare victory over, we are somewhat disoriented.

Even if we consider Iraq to be the front line in the “War on Terror”, we are somewhat challenged in defining progress in terms that we can easily understand because there are no geographic objectives defined beyond Iraq.  It is not as if we are planning to continue on to other terrorist states beyond Iraq. So instead of viewing Iraq as a front, we start viewing it as a quagmire; in essence, because there is no line to move and we are staying in one place for an extended period of time, there is no obvious progress and therefore we are not winning.

Well, it appears as if our enemy does see Iraq as a key battleground in this war:

AP 12/20/2006 – “I want to tell the Republicans and the Democrats together … you are trying to negotiate with some parties to secure your withdrawal, but these parities won’t find you an exit (from Iraq) and your attempts will yield nothing but failure,” al-Zawahri said on the tape.

“It seems that you will go through a painful journey of failed negotiations until you will be forced to return to negotiate with the real powers,” he said, without identifying these powers.

So, even if we narrowly define the enemy as those who attacked us on 9/11, and if we are in agreement that al-Qaida is this enemy we are fighting, how can we not believe that Iraq is an important battlefield against this enemy when their leaders tell us that it is?

Those among us who are promoting a retreat from Iraq, whether it be called a redeployment, gradual withdrawal, or some other euphemism… those who are calling for the United States to pull out of Iraq are actually calling for the United States to retreat from the front line of this war.

Do we need to find a better way to fight this war? Yes. But we can not afford to retreat from the front and hand our enemy a victory they have not earned.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Movie Night – Christmas Spirit

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

Because we missed two movie nights while I was trying to move Thinkin’bout Stuff to a new host for two weeks, and since I can’t think of anything I feel like writing about, I decided to post some videos tonight to help get us into the Christmas Spirit.  I spent a few hours sifting through some not-so-good Christmas videos on YouTube to find some classics (new and old) that I hope you will enjoy as much as I did.

A beautiful and moving performance of Oh Holy Night by LeAnn Rimes (there is a slight stutter in the video at th 37 second mark, but the rest is OK):

YouTube Preview Image

 

A classic from the great Nat King Cole:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Speaking of classics, had to include this one from The King:

YouTube Preview Image

 

One of my all time favorites:

YouTube Preview Image

 

A moving video from Kelly Clarkson:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Assembled in America

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

The first steel column for the Freedom Tower in New York City was installed today, marking another milestone in the rebuilding effort 5 years after the attack on the United States by Islamic Fascists.

AP 12/19/2006: “Today the steel rises, the Freedom Tower rises from the ashes of Sept. 11, and the people of New York and the people of American can be proud,” said Gov. George Pataki. A second column, about a foot taller and covered with signatures from steelworkers and politicians in Virginia, was installed a short time later.

By next spring, builders say the jumbo steel columns will rise to street level — about 70 feet from the bottom of ground zero.

The 27 columns — among the largest made in the world — were forged in Luxembourg, then shipped to Lynchburg, Va., to be fabricated so they could be installed at the foundation. The entire tower will eventually be built with 45,000 tons of steel, builders say.

Kinda wish we could build the whole thing with US steel, but I guess those days are long gone. At least the fabricating was done here in the USA.

Gov.-elect Eliot Spitzer and the incoming head of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which is building the tower, recently said they planned to look again at the tower’s designs. Spitzer has also questioned the tower’s economic viability, although he has committed to moving the governor’s office there when it opens in 2011. State and federal agencies have already agreed to occupy half of the building’s office space.

Ah yes, new politicians in the mix means we get to talk some more before doing. Bet they make a few changes and then declare it economically viable, which will then allow them to take credit for any future success related to the project.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Let the Sunshine In

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

Let the Sunshine In

A village in the Italian Alps is finally basking in winter sunlight thanks to a giant mirror installed on a mountain top to reflect the sun’s rays into the main square.

“Here it’s very cold in the winter and residents, many of whom are elderly, used to stay inside all the time. Now people are enjoying sitting on the bench in the square and having a chat,” said Maria Velona, who works at the townhall.

Clever! Wonder what happens in summer?

 

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share