The bias in the press is getting so blatantly obvious and over the top, it’s irritating folks on both sides of the aisle. A free press is one of the cornerstones of our country. Hard to be free when you are in someone’s pocket.
I like Kirsten Powers. Don’t often agree with her, but I always get the sense she is being fair. My respect for her has increased after reading this article in the NY Post:
Barack Obama’s choice of Joe Biden as his running mate prompted a small wave of warnings about Biden’s propensity for gaffes. But no one imagined even in a worse-case scenario such a spectacular bomb as telling donors Sunday to “gird your loins” because a young president Obama will be tested by an international crisis just like young President John Kennedy was.
Scary? You betcha! But somehow, not front-page news.
Again the media showed their incredible bias by giving scattered coverage of Biden’s statements.
There were a few exceptions. On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” co-host Mika Brzezinski flipped incredulously through the papers, expressing shock at the lack of coverage of Biden’s remarks. Guest Dan Rather admitted that if Palin had said it, the media would be going nuts.
So what gives?
The stock answer is: “It’s just Biden being Biden.” We all know how smart he is about foreign policy, so it’s not the same as when Sarah Palin says something that seems off.
Yet, when Biden asserted incorrectly in the vice-presidential debate that the United States “drove Hezbollah out of Lebanon,” nobody in the US media shrieked. (It was, however, covered with derision in the Middle East.) Or when he confused his history by claiming FDR calmed the nation during the Depression by going on TV, the press didn’t take it as evidence that he’s clueless.
And Biden is the foreign-policy gravitas on the Democratic ticket, so his comments are actually even more disconcerting.
The outakes of his Sunday remarks don’t begin to capture the magnitude of what he said. After warning the crowd that there would be some sort of international incident – Biden could think of four or five scenarios – he told the donors: “We’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”
What does that mean? Obama’s election would provoke an international incident because of his inexperience and even Obama’s biggest supporters won’t be reassured by his response?
Then there were Biden’s predictions on the economy: “I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, ‘Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? . . . Why is this thing so tough? . . . I’m asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point, because you’re going to have to reinforce us.
“There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, ‘Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don’t know about that decision.’ ”
Biden is teling us that, at a time when Americans need to feel confidence in their government, they will be going “Oh my God.” Not a great message.
Needless to say, if Sarah Palin said this about a McCain administration, the media world would be exploding.
Whether you believe Biden is exaggerating, as he is known to do, or is providing real insight, the double standard in the media does even more damage to their lagging brand.
Part of the problem is their “Obama love,” but we’re also seeing the media elite’s belief – prejudice – that anyone with an R behind their name is dumb. So, if they say something dumb, they must be dumb. A Democrat, like Biden, can make wildly inaccurate or outrageous comments and they are ignored because the TV and press insiders feel they “know who he really is.”
On the stump recently, Sen. Biden declared he had “three words” for what the nation needs: “J-O-B-S.”
Lucky for him, his name isn’t Dan Quayle, or that would have followed him for the rest of his career.
Apologies for pasting the entire article, but there was no fluff… minor correction though, Biden said “three letter word”.
There have been many other mistakes Biden has made that have been ignored, but Powers made the point very well… Biden and Obama have been given a free pass while McCain and Palin can’t even buy a break from the media.
Another great article here: Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn on the Lights? (h/t to Valerie). The author, Orson Scott Card, is also Democrat.. check out his bio here.
|
|
|
|
good article. liberals, like myself, are speaking out – but we cannot get heard either!
More examples:
http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/washington-post-proclaims-that-sarah.html
http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/is-liberal-sexism-ok-no.html
http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-proposes-90-day-moratorium-on.html
http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-allows-two-racists-to-campaign.html
Independents Speak up!!!
Welcome Tony… is that your blog? Will check it out…
Aside from my obvious leaning to the conservative side on many (most?) issues, I’m getting very concerned that we are moving to a one party government (two party in name only) and that is not good no matter which side is in power. We need checks in this form of government that I fear will vanish on Nov 4. I would feel much better if we could at least trust that the press would act as an advocate for the people and not behave as cheerleaders… then again, they probably believe they are acting in our best interest when they put their agenda above accurate, investigative reporting. After all.. they know what is best for us.
Redhawk, that link was broken.
Also, this is a discussion forum, not a place to post links.
Here in the UK it is deemed unacceptable for people that call themselves journalists to opine on things in a “news” format. For example, we watch Fox News because we find it hilarious – there’s simply no news organisation here with that kind of bias, so we’re spellbound by Sean Hannity.
News is a factual account of events in the world, not a forum for peoples “views”, whereas in America it’s reversed. If a BBC journalist is suspected of political bias in reporting there’s national outrage and they’re sacked – because tax-payers effectively own the BBC, we don’t think they should have any input at all on matters of opinion. 1 for “socialism”?
Welcome Braithwaite.
Please don’t confuse the opinion shows (like Hannity & Colmes or O’Reilly) with the news shows on FoxNews. The news shows on FoxNews are actually quite fair and essentially the closest thing we have in the states to straight news reporting these days. I look at Special Report with Brit Hume as a transitional show in their lineup. The first half hour is straight news, the sceond half hour is opinion.
The difference between FoxNews and the others is that FoxNews let’s you know when they are giving opinion vs news. MSNBC, for example, is opinion disguised as news.