Archive for November, 2009

Update 2: SEUI vs Volunteers

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

An update from the Allentown Morning Call yesterday on the dispute between SEIU and the Boy Scout working on his Eagle project:

Hauling brush and old tires out of the woods in Allentown early Friday, members of the Service Employees International Union learned an Eagle-Scout-to-be is just as forgiving as he is trustworthy, loyal and helpful.

<snip>

To show there were no hard feelings, SEIU members from as far away as Philadelphia and New Jersey accepted Kevin’s invitation to help with the project Friday.

”They completely agreed — to come out, to help, to make amends,” said Kevin, a member of Troop 301 of Center Valley. ”I’m just glad it’s all coming together.”

As a result of the extra attention, Kevin found himself in charge of at least 40 volunteers, including Boy Scouts, parents, union members, a few Girl Scouts and the mayor of Bethlehem.

<snip>

Wayne MacManiman, who leads the SEIU’s Philadelphia-based mid-Atlantic district, said he thought Kevin’s invitation was a great idea.

”Everybody’s here on their day off, volunteering,” said MacManiman, of Burlington County, N.J. He noted SEIU members from Allentown had signed up to be part of the union’s 20-member crew.

Regardless of the motive of SEUI leadership, whether to make amends or fix a public relations nightmare, the folks who volunteered their time on a day off should be commended.  Stating the obvious, or at least something that should be obvious, it is much better to see Americans working together than attacking each other.

Perhaps SEUI leaders and members will take a lesson from this clear contrast between bullying and community outreach.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Unemployment gender gap: Was beginning to think no one else noticed

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

July 2 this year we published a chart showing a significant and growing gap between the unemployment rate for men and women.  Even sent a copy of the chart to a couple of media folks.  Either missed all of the media discussion on the subject or no one thought it was interesting enough to report.

Yesterday’s opinion piece in the WSJ, by David Paul Kuhn, is the first I’ve seen on the subject.

Why is this gap significant?  If we assume that in most American households the man is still the main source of income, the impact of the unemployment rate on American families is greater than has been reported since the rate for men 20-years and older passed 10% all the way back in July.

Here’s the latest chart:

Not sure why this has not been worthy of discussion before today, but here are some excerpts from the WSJ article:

Last month the unemployment rate climbed above 10% for the first time in more than a quarter century. Less noticed is that male workers crossed this same threshold six months earlier. Since the U.S. became the world’s dominant economic power, no downturn has fallen more disproportionately on one gender.

The unemployment rate for men, 11.4%, based on seasonally adjusted data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, outpaces the rate for women, 8.8%. We now have the largest jobless gender gap since tracking became possible in 1948.

<snip>

And yet, for all its unprecedented scope and nature, the limited attention and passive response it has received are remarkable. Imagine the outcry if women amounted to roughly three in four lost jobs in this recession.

<snip>

The solution is not a male version of the Labor Department’s Women’s Bureau. Men don’t need to start viewing themselves as victims. But the stimulus or new jobs bills could be adjusted to address the wave of male unemployment by expanding public works spending. It would make for more effective policy and be fairer. As the feminist movement taught us, what happens to one gender happens to us all.

Especially since the impact spreads to the whole family when dad is out of work.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Happy Thanksgiving

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Wrote a little diddy I’d like to share, to the tune of “12 Days of Christmas”  .. hope you have a great Thanksgiving!

The 8 days of Thanksgiving:

On the day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, turkey with all the fixings

On second day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the third day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, fresh turkey salad, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the fourth day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, turkey almond ding, fresh turkey salad, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the fifth day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, — five turkey cakes… turkey almond ding, fresh turkey salad, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the sixth day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, strips of turkey jerky, — five turkey cakes… turkey almond ding, fresh turkey salad, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the seventh day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, seven bones for picking, strips of turkey jerky, — five turkey cakes… turkey almond ding, fresh turkey salad, two turkey subs and all the sides and the fixings

On the eighth day of Thanksgiving my dear wife served to me, thankfully no more turkey!

© 2009 Thinkin’Bout Stuff – All rights reserved.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Animated Unemployment Chart

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

Just received a link to an animated unemployment chart, by county, showing the painful increase in folks who are out of work since January 2007.  I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that January 2007 is when the Democrats took control of both the House and the Senate.

Major hat tip to Latoya Egwuekwe who is credited on the chart as being the author… this had to take a bit of effort to pull together:

Animated Unemployment Map

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Who’s money is it anyway?

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

Someone overpays you $200,000,000,000 – do you:

  1. Give them back their money
  2. Buy them “something nice” and give that to them instead
  3. Hang on to the money in case you need it for something later

That’s pretty much the question in front of our leaders in Congress and the White House:

Politico -

Congressional Democrats could be careening toward a head-on collision with the White House over $200 billion in leftover bailout money — money that Republicans think should simply be returned to taxpayers.

AKA give us back our money.

The Treasury Department is pushing for fiscal prudence and wants to use the money to pay down the deficit and keep a small rainy-day fund in case of economic catastrophe.

AKA hang on to the money in case they need the money later.

But Democrats are salivating over the possibility of $200 billion in unspent money.

House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson of Connecticut wants dough to fund job-creation legislation. Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank, the powerful chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, wants to direct $2 billion of repaid Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to loans for unemployed homeowners so they can avoid foreclosure. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California admits that “there’s a good bit of interest” in spreading the money around to various economic projects.

AKA buy us “something nice” and give us that instead of our money.

That $200B, part of the huge $700 bank bailout at the end of 2008, was supposed to be repaid to we the people if it wasn’t needed.   The fact that there is even a question about whether or not that money should be returned to us proves that these people, especially the Democrats, can not be trusted with our money.

Might want to consider this very clear difference in the way our leaders view our money the next time you decide who you want spending your money … I know I’ll be voting for the guys who want to give me my money back.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Gorewellians Exposed?

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

If this is legit, you betcha…

From various sources, not sure who first posted or where this info was first posted, but here’s the Telegraph’s take:

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

<snip>

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

The article includes several sample emails as does Watts Up With That and The Herald Sun.

For years Gorewellians have tried to scare us into believing that radical behavioral change is required to save the Earth from the terrible effects of human-caused global warming.

Those of us who were skeptical were lumped in with the nuts who believe man never landed on the moon.

Forget that Gore and many of his followers do not practice what they preach, flying all over the globe in private jets and leaving a carbon footprint far exceeding that of just about every American.

Pay no attention to the millions of dollars earned by folks like Gore who are cashing in on this fear.

Never mind how much supporters stand to gain through the sale of new technologies to combat global warming.

Don’t dare question how “buying” an acre of rain forest to ease your guilt about driving a Hummer does anything beyond putting money into the pockets of profiteers.

All of that is nothing more than deflections, distractions and deceptions  spun by those among us who refuse to believe the absolute fact that global warming is a foregone conclusion and that man’s culpability is settled science.

Even Bill O’Reilly says we’re idiots for questioning the “facts”:

I am a big fan of the Factor and was disappointed O’Reilly went with the pack on this one without questioning how much truly was settled science and how much was spin from folks who stand to profit from the battle against global warming.

Assuming this leak is a legit look into a cover up of facts that run counter to the position that global warming exists and is man made, it is reasonable to question why the need for a cover up if this is settled science.  And if this is not settled science, questioning is appropriate (actually, even if it is settled science, questioning is appropriate… it used to be settled science that the Earth was flat).

And… if questioning is appropriate, I suppose those of us questioning the “facts” are not idiots after all.

Now about that moon landing…  just kidding.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

UPDATED: SEIU vs Volunteers – Which Obama Pet Wins?

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

UPDATE: 11/20 See update over at Michelle Malkin: SEIU leader who threatened Boy Scout quits

… and also from the Morning Call:

Three days of taking body blows nationally from conservative pundits, a rebuke from the Lehigh Valley’s congressman and even a lashing from his own union led Balzano to voluntarily resign his position Thursday as head of the local Service Employees International Union.

Balzano said he and seven other executive officers of the local SEIU stepped down.

Unfortunate outcome to something that could have been easily avoided by simply acknowledging that not everyone needs to bow to the wishes of SEIU.

———————————————————–

Article in the Morning Call of Allentown, PA -

In pursuit of an Eagle Scout badge, Kevin Anderson, 17, has toiled for more than 200 hours hours over several weeks to clear a walking path in an east Allentown park.

Nick Balzano, president of the local Service Employees International Union, told Allentown City Council Tuesday that the union is considering filing a grievance against the city for allowing Anderson to clear a 1,000-foot walking and biking path at Kimmets Lock Park.

“We’ll be looking into the Cub Scout or Boy Scout who did the trails,” Balzano told the council.

SEIU will be looking into the Boy Scout who did the trails?  Seriously?

Isn’t this the same SEIU who’s president has visited the White House more than any other person on this Earth?

Wasn’t this Boy Scout volunteering his time as President Obama has encouraged all Americans to do?

Do we need to check in with the unions, specifically SEIU, prior to performing volunteer work to avoid a visit from a few thugs with baseball bats?

More from the Morning Call -

Balzano said Saturday he isn’t targeting Boy Scouts. But given the city’s decision in July to lay off 39 SEIU members, Balzano said “there’s to be no volunteers.” No one except union members may pick up a hoe or shovel, plant a flower or clear a walking path.

SEIU has spoken!

But, but.. how do we know what we can and can’t volunteer to do?  Doesn’t the president want all Americans to volunteer?

Calling service an integral part of how we meet the challenges of our time, President Barack Obama renewed his appeal for all Americans to make service a part of their daily lives in an address to 2,000 service leaders gathered at the Points of Light Institute’s “Presidential Forum on Service” at Texas A& M University on October 16th.

Perhaps President Obama should send out a clarification.  Perhaps we should make service a part of our daily lives as long as that service has been authorized by the local chapter of SEIU or is sanctioned by ACORN as an appropriate use of our time and energy.

Thankfully it appears this young scout may be given a reprieve because of the attention this has received:

“We are probably going to let this one go,” Balzano said .

Probably…  maybe he should lock the doors just in case.

Folks losing their jobs is sad and an unfortunate consequence of an economy that is being driven into the ground by our “leaders” in Congress.

But this scout did not take anyone’s job.  No one was going to be hired to complete this project.  The only thing that would have been “accomplished” by stopping this scout is the path would still be inaccessible to folks who can now enjoy some fresh air and exercise along its route.

So happy SEIU has such influence over our president and, apparently, our lives.

More from FoxNews here.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share