Archive for the ‘Abortion’ Category

Acceptable behavior for a Supreme Court nominee?

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Until now, I really couldn’t see anything  that should disqualify Kagan from serving on the US Supreme Court.  Certainly don’t agree with her political views, likely positions on issues, and anticipated willingness to set aside the US Constitution when she believes it is the right thing to do, but that’s what we get for electing Barack Obama.

But now…

Now that we hear that she altered a statement by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to word it such that it would not be a “disaster” for President Clinton’s position on a partial birth abortion ban, essentially withholding the truth from Congress… a willful act of deceit…  she should be disqualified from consideration.

Have our standards dipped so low that we are ready to appoint to our highest court, for life, a woman who had no problem changing the meaning of the conclusion of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to suite the political goals of her boss (President Clinton) and to support a position she very likely holds herself.

From FoxNews:

As a Republican-controlled Congress in the 1990s debated whether to ban the controversial procedure, Kagan wrote a memo in which she expressed concern about a statement that the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist was going to release that revealed its panel of experts found no circumstances in which the procedure was the only option for saving the life of the woman.

“This, of course, would be a disaster,” she wrote.

Kagan revised the language so the final statement in 1997 said that the partial-birth abortion “may be the best and most appropriate procedure in particular circumstances to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”

So.. the final statement went from no circumstance where partial birth abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother… to a statement where partial birth abortion is the best option to save the life of the mother.

Yeah…  those two statements mean the same thing….

Call it what you want… I call it perpetrating a fraud on the American people….

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

More than 1.2m die from medical procedure each year

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

As the health care reform debate rages on, we have heard a lot about the millions of Americans without health insurance and limited access to the best health care money can provide.

What is missing from this debate is any attempt to address a medical procedure that kills more than 1.2 million American children every year.

H1N1 has killed nearly 100 children this year and makes headlines.

But nary a word in this debate about what will be done to prevent the deaths of more than 1.2 million American children at the hands of abortion doctors.

Four years ago Senator Hillary Clinton gave a speech on reproductive rights where she looked forward to a time when abortion would be “truly safe, legal and rare”.

To this day we have yet to hear what “rare” means.

Approximately 20% of all pregnancies in the United States ends in abortion.

1 out of every 5.

More than 1.2 million every year.

More than 5 million since Clinton gave that speech.

That sound rare to you?

What do we usually think of societies that kill the most helpless among us in the millions?

The Nazis killed 6 million Jews during a span of about 6 years… in that same span of years, we have killed more than 7 million.

Are we really OK with that?

From Thinkin’Bout Stuff July 17, 2009, Our Real National Shame:

Liberals like Barack Obama are fond of apologizing for all of the real and perceived past sins of our great country.  But one thing that they are not ashamed of, that they offer no apologies for, is the ongoing systematic destruction of our own children not yet born.

As science continues to improve and progress, we are seeing more and more evidence that human life begins well before birth.  To look at images of a precious child in the womb and claim that “it” is not a human, the most vulnerable among us and yet not deserving of any rights or protection, is a selfish denial of reality that leads to acceptance of a mass genocide that far surpasses any that we currently condemn as evil in history books.

What will be our legacy?  What will history have to say about our generation, about our country?  Ten, fifty, a hundred years from now, as it becomes painfully obvious what we have done, historians will not be kind to our generation.  We have far surpassed the sins of our fathers who enslaved.  Far surpassed the sins of our fathers who suppressed women.

We, our generation, has the blood of our own children on our hands.

This is not to say that those who have abortions or participate in abortions are evil… we have been told by our leaders that this is about choice, that these are not really humans, that they do not have the rights of a real human (sounding familiar?)…  if you believe what you are doing is right when you are doing it that does not make you a bad person.

But we now have evidence that our leaders are wrong.  These are real live humans that we are exterminating.  Unwanted pregnancies will likely always be a problem, but is this our final solution?

From this day forward, we have no excuse and history will judge us no better than the mass murderers of the past.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Our real national shame

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Liberals like Barack Obama are fond of apologizing for all of the real and perceived past sins of our great country.  But one thing that they are not ashamed of, that they offer no apologies for, is the ongoing systematic destruction of our own children not yet born.

As science continues to improve and progress, we are seeing more and more evidence that human life begins well before birth.  To look at images of a precious child in the womb and claim that “it” is not a human, the most vulnerable among us and yet not deserving of any rights or protection, is a selfish denial of reality that leads to acceptance of a mass genocide that far surpasses any that we currently condemn as evil in history books.

What will be our legacy?  What will history have to say about our generation, about our country?  Ten, fifty, a hundred years from now, as it becomes painfully obvious what we have done, historians will not be kind to our generation.  We have far surpassed the sins of our fathers who enslaved.  Far surpassed the sins of our fathers who suppressed women.

We, our generation, has the blood of our own children on our hands.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Population control via abortion? This should be interesting to watch…

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Here’s the quote:

NY Times MagazineFrankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

Whoa!

So who is this person who believed, at the time, that the fight for abortion rights was to address overpopulation and to specifically limit growth in undesirable populations (race? religion?)?

Why.. none other than left-wing Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States….  Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Will there be calls for her resignation?  Cries of racism?  Wringing of hands, gnashing of teeth, burning of effigies,  marches on Washington?

Probably not… she couldn’t have really meant what she said because, heck, she’s one of the good guys.  How could anyone who supports abortion have anything but the best of intentions, right?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

What things outrage our president?

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

A terrible crime is committed.

One of many that occurs somewhere in the United States probably every day.

Definitely news worthy, definitely an expectation that justice will be served.

Forget that the man performed thousands of abortions (I heard over 60,000 quoted but can not find confirmation), hundreds or thousands of them late-term or partial-birth abortions, murdering him was wrong….   he needed to be stopped, but that was not the way.  Until the laws are changed, babies will continue to be killed.

But is this something that the president needed to weigh in on.  The White House issued a statement from the president and US Marshalls were dispatched to protect abortion clinics all over the country:

“I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning.  However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”

If you believe it is something worthy of presidential comment, how do you feel about a terrorist act by  Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad on US soil?

This domestic Muslim terrorist shot two Army recruiters, killing one.

Is our president outraged?

Perhaps…  but I don’t suppose we know for sure since he did not deem this to be worthy of response, nor to my knowledge,  have US Marshalls been dispatched to protect recruiting stations.

Maybe this was a random incident, not well thought out or planned… just another murder.  Or, perhaps not:

From ABC News:  The Arkansas man accused of killing an Army recruiter and wounding another had used the popular Google Maps application to investigate recruiting centers in at least five states, as well as Jewish institutions, a day-care center, a post office and a Baptist Church, according to a report issued Tuesday evening by the Department of Homeland Security, ABC News has learned.
A suspect is in custody amid reports of homegrown terrorism.

Recruiting centers in New York, Atlanta, Louisville and Philadelphia were on a list of possible targets, based on evidence found in the home of the suspect, Muslim-convert Abdulhakim Muhammed, according to the report.

<snip>

… prior to the shooting, Muhammad had been the subject of a preliminary investigation by the FBI’s Joint Terrorist Task Force since his return from Yemen, where he was arrested and had in his possession a false Somali passport

Hmmm…  Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad was a suspected terrorist who killed an Army recruiter… kind of confirms the suspicion, no?

So we have a Muslim terrorist shooting American military personnel on US soil…  and President Obama doesn’t think this is worthy of comment…  but the murder of an abortion doctor is?

Interesting….

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Abortion issue explained in terms even Obama can understand

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Double hat tip to Bottom Line Up Front.  First for reminding us of this lame dodge by then candidate Obama:

YouTube Preview Image

Second for sharing the video below…

Found it amazing then, and still do now, that it is above Obama’s pay grade to determine at what point a baby gets human rights but he has no problem deciding when a baby can be killed for any reason or no reason at all.

Well Mr. President, this young lady is here to help you understand:

YouTube Preview Image

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Abortion destroys potential… just ask our president

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

Just because a life is hard does not mean it is not worth living.

I may not agree with much of what Barack Obama says or does, but still I am thankful he lived a life that has inspired millions, a life he could not have lived had he not been born.

YouTube Preview Image

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share