Archive for the ‘Global Warming’ Category

Obama ready to borrow $10B/year to give to “developing” countries

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Let’s say you go to a rather generous banker and borrow a million dollars.  As a newly minted millionaire, you decide to be generous and give away all of your money.  No worries, next year you can just borrow another million dollars and give that away too.

You can do this over and over again because… you’re rich!

Except for one minor technicality.. you still need to pay back the generous banker… with interest.

Sound like a good plan to you?

Apparently President Obama thinks this is a logical and fiscally sound approach to global citizenship:

FoxNews - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters in Copenhagen the United States is willing to commit up to $10 billion a year by 2012, and would support a global fund of $100 billion a year to help developing nations deal with climate change, provided the nations here are willing live up to the ‘transparency’ demanded by the U.S.

$10 billion per year, money we do not have, paid to “developing nations”.  Like China… who just happens to be America’s generous banker.

So… we are promising to borrow money from China so we can send money to China and other developing countries so that those countries will agree to reduce CO2 emissions.

Nothing wrong with that plan…

No worries though… President Obama knows where he can get that money to pay back our bankers.  All us rich Americans, and our kids, and their kids, and their kids will be happy to pay a large chunk of our pay checks so that we will one day live in a world where people no longer live in fear of CO2.

In fact, we can all do our part here… please refrain from breathing out.  It’s not your fault really, you can’t help yourself.  As long as you breath out you release CO2 into the air and contribute to global warming.  No one is suggesting you stop breathing in… just don’t breath out.

Thank you for your support…

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Gorewellians Exposed?

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

If this is legit, you betcha…

From various sources, not sure who first posted or where this info was first posted, but here’s the Telegraph’s take:

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

<snip>

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

The article includes several sample emails as does Watts Up With That and The Herald Sun.

For years Gorewellians have tried to scare us into believing that radical behavioral change is required to save the Earth from the terrible effects of human-caused global warming.

Those of us who were skeptical were lumped in with the nuts who believe man never landed on the moon.

Forget that Gore and many of his followers do not practice what they preach, flying all over the globe in private jets and leaving a carbon footprint far exceeding that of just about every American.

Pay no attention to the millions of dollars earned by folks like Gore who are cashing in on this fear.

Never mind how much supporters stand to gain through the sale of new technologies to combat global warming.

Don’t dare question how “buying” an acre of rain forest to ease your guilt about driving a Hummer does anything beyond putting money into the pockets of profiteers.

All of that is nothing more than deflections, distractions and deceptions  spun by those among us who refuse to believe the absolute fact that global warming is a foregone conclusion and that man’s culpability is settled science.

Even Bill O’Reilly says we’re idiots for questioning the “facts”:

I am a big fan of the Factor and was disappointed O’Reilly went with the pack on this one without questioning how much truly was settled science and how much was spin from folks who stand to profit from the battle against global warming.

Assuming this leak is a legit look into a cover up of facts that run counter to the position that global warming exists and is man made, it is reasonable to question why the need for a cover up if this is settled science.  And if this is not settled science, questioning is appropriate (actually, even if it is settled science, questioning is appropriate… it used to be settled science that the Earth was flat).

And… if questioning is appropriate, I suppose those of us questioning the “facts” are not idiots after all.

Now about that moon landing…  just kidding.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

The Cap & Trade Video Obama Admin Doesn’t Want You to See

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

The creators of this video were told to take it down… but once something is out there on the Net, hard to pull it back:

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Quick thoughts: cabinet making, auto pilots and I see ice

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

I find the following video clip from Fox News fascinating:

So let’s summarize:

  • Our new Energy Secretary feels like he has been “dumped into the deep end of the pool”; doesn’t know the administration’s policy on OPEC and contends he is “not the administration”, and he doesn’t believe oil production is in his domain…. hmmmmm
  • Only 2 of 18 members of Obama’s new task force to fix the US auto industry drive American made cars…. guess they will bring an interesting perspective to the table
  • Oops… a satellite glitch has caused scientists to underestimate Arctic sea ice by 193,000 square miles this year! That’s a big chunk of ice to miss.  Guess Al Gore will need to make note of that for his slide show on global warming

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

No end to Global Warming….

Friday, July 18th, 2008

… hypocrisy.

Found this video at one of my favorite stops on the net: Bottom Line, Up Front

From the folks at Americans for Prosperity:

YouTube Preview Image

At first I laughed, but after awhile I was so annoyed at the hypocrisy I no longer found it humorous.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

If only someone had listened to me 2 years ago…

Monday, May 19th, 2008

Originally published in 2006, republished in 2007.. and now here we are in 2008 and it still may not be too late, but it sure as heck would have been better if we had addressed this two years ago.  Reprinted here in it’s entirety:  How to Break the Oil Habit

_________________________________________________________

The following was originally posted July 2006. I decided to repost it (with some minor updates) because I believe we need to stop talking about freeing ourselves from our addiction to oil and start to actually do something about it. Also, since it was only the 3rd article I posted, odds are I’m the only one who read it :-)

Although the price of oil has come down since this was written, the key points remain the same:

  • We need to encourage research and development of alternative energy sources
  • We need to encourage conservation of existing sources
  • We need to do this in a way that limits the money funneled to terrorist backers like Iran
  • We need to counter the money flowing out to terrorist nations with money flowing into our own government until we can break our addiction to oil

The bottom line for those not planning to read the entire article:

I propose that for the next five years, a new federal tax on gasoline (not diesel.. just gasoline) be phased in, increasing from 25 cents a gallon the first year to $1.25 in year five and continuing until the end of the war AND the identification of a viable alternative to oil for 50% – 75% of our energy needs. 
Painful… sure.  So is paying more for gasoline when OPEC raises the price of crude oil… but we get nothing out of it when they raise the price.  If we ever expect to kick the oil habit and fund the war on terror… we need to be willing to make some sacrifices. 

—— July 23, 2006 ——

How many of you believe the price of fuel is too high, probably going higher, will ultimately wreck our economy and we need prices lowered, stabilized and affordable? … Raise your hands.

How many of you believe oil is a limited resource, that we need to encourage conservation, we need to identify alternatives to our dependency on mid-east oil and until we find a way to break the shackles of oil dependency, our future will continue to be threatened by nut cases who line their pockets and grow their weapons stockpiles with buckets of money shipped overseas in empty crude oil containers courtesy of you and me?  Raise your hands.

Did you raise your hand both times?  I wonder how typical that is of Americans.  We want fuel to be cheap and “affordable” so we can use as much as we want, yet we know that we also need to conserve this limited resource and find alternatives.  Trouble is, as long as fuel is affordable, there is no incentive to conserve and little incentive to find alternatives.  As with any addict, we won’t stop consuming until the supply is gone or the cost is so high we can’t pay for the fix.

How much does a gallon of gasoline have to cost for us to change our driving habits.  Gas hits $5 a gallon, are you still driving down to the shore or out to the country every weekend? Would $8 a gallon convince you to walk to the corner store instead of drive?  $10 and maybe it’s not worth driving 15 miles to see if you can get this new lawn mower at another store for a few dollars less?

What about commuting?  There will always be jobs where commuting is required (hard to work construction from the comfort of your family room); but do we all have to commute, or do we all think we have to commute?  Until 6 years ago, I commuted to work, 100 miles round trip, every weekday.  That’s 500 miles/week; assuming four weeks for vacations, holidays, other days off, that’s 24,000 miles per year.  My car got 30 miles to the gallon, which is better than average, which means I was using about 800 gallons of gas a year just to drive to work!

Assuming there are just 1 million people in a similar situation who could be working from home.  (not out of the question considering our current population is about 300 million according to the US Census and 14 million of us commute 45 minutes or more one way to work), that would be a yearly reduction of 800 million gallons of gasoline!!!!

According to the Energy Information Administration, in 2004 47% of the cost of a gallon of gasoline was to pay for the crude oil.  Assuming a gallon of gas costs $3.00, those 800 million gallons means more than $1.1 BILLION dollars going to the crude oil producers like Iran!!  Every year.  From those 1 million of us who might want to consider not commuting and setting up a home office.

$1.1 Billion dollars that could be spent here in the USA instead of on rockets for Hezbollah who then fires them into Israel while trying to distract us from the nuclear games Iran is playing

So demand continues to rise, prices continue to rise, the amount of real dollars shipped overseas to crude oil producers continues to rise, and available supplies continue to drop.  Even if raising crude oil prices causes a drop in consumption, the profit margin for the producers likely offsets the decrease in volume since the bulk of the price hike goes into their pockets.  What we need to do is reduce demand by raising prices in such a way that the crude oil producers do not benefit.

I can’t believe I am saying this, because I am almost ALWAYS opposed to new or increased taxes, but….

  1. We need to encourage research and development of alternative energy sources
  2. We need to encourage conservation of existing sources
  3. We need to do this in a way that limits the money funneled to terrorist backers like Iran
  4. We need to counter the money flowing out to terrorist nations with money flowing into our own government until we can break our addiction to oil

We need a (hand shaking as I type) Homeland Security and Energy Evolution Tax.

Look, the price of gas is going to go up until the demand comes down, and a lot of the money will go to weapons for terrorists.  In simplistic terms, if raising prices reduces demand, and if demand outruns supply, the prices are going to go up until demand and supply meet a state of equilibrium, period.  Inserting a tax into the equation drives down demand without increasing the flow of money to the crude oil producers.

Demand goes down, less money flows to terrorist nations, and we perhaps buy some time to develop alternative energy sources.

So where does that revenue go?  Two places, and only two places.  First, 50% goes to sponsor research for domestic sources of energy that require no dependence on foreign resources.  The other 50%, directly to Homeland Security and Defense. 

Are we at war? Well duh! So why are you whining about a tax to support the war effort and to eliminate one potential cause (if not the root cause) of the war? (Come on, some of you are whining and you know it)  If we weren’t dependent on foreign oil maybe our decision making when attacked wouldn’t be so complicated… bad guys go boom!

I propose that for the next five years, a new federal tax on gasoline (not diesel.. just gasoline) be phased in, increasing from 25 cents a gallon the first year to $1.25 in year five and continuing until the end of the war AND the identification of a viable alternative to oil for 50% – 75% of our energy needs.

Painful… sure.  So is paying more for gasoline when OPEC raises the price of crude oil… but we get nothing out of it when they raise the price.  If we ever expect to kick the oil habit and fund the war on terror… we need to be willing to make some sacrifices.  This doesn’t even come close to what our country sacrificed in World War II.  Time to suck it up people!

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Painting the roses green?

Monday, November 5th, 2007

Sometimes I feel like I’ve stepped into a strange warped version of our world, kind of like Alice in her Adventures in Wonderland.

The Queen says everyone must stop using so much fuel and energy while flying in a private jet to spread the message  (OK, Al Gore is not a queen… but work with me here).

He then wins a Nobel Peace Prize for … um … what exactly did he win the award for again?  Be right back…

Here we go…

From CNN:  … the Nobel committee announced he would share the award with the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for their work to raise awareness about global warming.

Oops… guess I should have known that. So much for raising awareness…

If only the Nobel Peace Prize was actually still a credible award. 

1994 Yasser Arafat, head of the PLO and a sponsor of terrorism,  shared the award with Shimon Peres and Yitzak Rabin.

2001 the award went to the United Nations and its corrupt head, Kofi Annan.

The very next year, the arguably the worst president in US history, whose policies and “leadership” set the stage for the current situations in Iran and Iraq as well as providing early evidence to Islamic extremists that the US no longer had the will to defend ourselves, Jimmy Carter received the award for his “untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts”… otherwise known as opening up the US checkbook to buy peace in the mideast:

The agreement also resulted in the United States committing to several billion dollars worth of annual subsidies to the governments of both Israel and Egypt, subsidies which continue to this day…

Several BILLION dollars … annually… to both Israel and Egypt.  Heck, I’ll stop arguing for that kind of green too.  Since you and I are paying for this every year without fail, maybe we should get a turn or two with the Nobel Peace Prize on our mantel.

But I digress.

So Al Gore wins the Nobel Peace Prize for spreading a message. Apparently there was no requirement that the message actually be credible, as long as it was spread.

From The Sydney Morning Herald: One of the world’s foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize “ridiculous” and the product of “people who don’t understand how the atmosphere works”.

Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans were not responsible for the warming of the earth.

His comments came on the same day that the Nobel committee honoured Mr Gore for his work in support of the link between humans and global warming.

“We’re brainwashing our children,” said Dr Gray, 78, a long-time professor at Colorado State University. “They’re going to the Gore movie [An Inconvenient Truth] and being fed all this. It’s ridiculous.”

Whoa now.. hold on there partner. What gives you the right to question Al Gore? What makes you think that you, a long-time professor and world renowned meteorologist, knows more about the cause of global warming than Al Gore, a man so knowledgeable about so many things, a man who once stood before busts of Washington and Jefferson and asked “Who are these people?”  Don’t believe me, hear it for yourself here or visit the full site here.

So what has all this raised awareness accomplished? Let’s just say that, if we really are the cause of global warming, we’re in real trouble with role models who fly in private jets and ease there conscience by buying “carbon offsets”, who sponsor rock concerts to raise awareness that use more electricity in one day than my town uses in a year (OK.. I’m guessing … and they all had to get to and from the concert with all there gear somehow),  and by talking endlessly on the subject (CO2… remember, the more they talk the more CO2 comes out of their mouths… that’s a greenhouse gas. All this awareness raising is also raising the temperature of the Earth. Please, for everyone’s sake, do us all a favor and stop talking.)

Which brings us to painting the roses green.

NBC went green this weekend, or so I’ve heard. I didn’t watch anything on NBC this weekend, but apparently they did clever things like painting the peacock green… sounds like they are bucking for a Nobel Peace Prize to me.

But I’m as concerned with the future of our home planet as the next guy, so I plan to do my part to help reduce my Co2 footprint.  Next weekend I plan to paint my five cars, my lawnmower, my snow blower and maybe a few of the neighbors cars, green.  Although this won’t actually reduce the amount of CO and CO2 I create through use of these evil implements of man, I will have done my part to raise awareness and can rest peacefully knowing I am in the company of great men like Al Gore.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share