Archive for the ‘Government’ Category

Sec. Clinton urges crackdown on human trafficking

Monday, September 14th, 2009

From FoxNews:

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warns that human trafficking is flourishing in the shadows of the global economic downturn.

This is a problem that needs more attention and Sec. Clinton should be applauded for pushing for a global crackdown.

With the apparent tendency of some ACORN workers to, at the least, look the other way when human trafficking is brought to their attention and seemingly willing, in some cases, to assist in setting up  housing for brothels full of children, will the Obama administration come out and condemn the behavior of these individuals and the ACORN organization as a whole?

Perhaps someone should ask Sec. Clinton her thoughts on ACORN, recipient of US tax dollars, and their role in human trafficking.

At the very least, with evidence mounting that these may not be isolated incidents, there should be a federal investigation into ACORN’s role in providing support for illegal activities in election fraud, prostitution, human trafficking and whatever other illegal activity the might be involved with while accepting our tax dollars.

ACORN might be totally innocent here, but there is at least enough evidence to take a closer look.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Updated Unemployment Charts

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Updated the charts with most recent seasonally adjusted data from US Depy of Labor.

Seasonally adjusted for men and women 20+ years:

Click Here for Unemployment Chart

Seasonally adjusted overall historical with Pres/House/Senate data:

Click Here for Historical Unemployment Chart

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

US Gov Screwing American Workers with Foreign Condoms?

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

From Fox News:

In a move that will cost around 300 American jobs, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has decided to purchase condoms from foreign companies – in countries like South Korea and China – because they cost less than American-made prophylactics…

The agency distributes billions of condoms to poor countries around the world, but has previously used only American-made condoms because of “Buy American” regulations, the Star reported. The stimulus bill that recently passed in Congress, however, does not include that provision for condoms.

Wait… hold on one second, trying to make sure we understand.  Before the stimulus bill, intended to stimulate the economy and create jobs, the US government purchased US made condoms.  After the bill, 300 US workers are out of work?

Must be a mistake.  Just some oversight that will be corrected now that they realize someone goofed, right?

A USAID official told the Star that the agency considered the jobs that would be lost, but that the foreign condoms cost about 2 cents. American ones cost about 5 cents.

Oh.  Oh my.  Not only are they using US tax dollars to give out free condoms to people around the world, they are spending those tax dollars in South Korea and China…

“We pay taxes down here, too, and with all this stimulus money going to save jobs, it seems to me like they should share this contract so they can save jobs here in America,” Fannie Thomas, who has worked at Alatech for 40 years, told the Star.

“I’ve made condoms here for 20 years,” Cindy Robinson, a $9.50-an-hour employee at Alatech, told the Star. “I understand why they bid the contract overseas, but they should buy American first, and I feel they are going back on their word.”

Hmmm…  I could be wrong, but I’m thinking these might not be union jobs at $9.50/hr.  So as far as the current administration is concerned, when it comes to US condom makers, screw em.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

No sirree, Obama’s not a socialist, not at all

Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

OK, I get that Obama and many in Congress believe that the government should have a role in determining the compensation of employees of companies that they purchased with taxpayer money.  Some logic there.  But here comes the proverbial slippery slope we often hear about.

From Fox News:

The Obama administration will call for increased oversight of executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies as part of a plan to overhaul financial regulation, the New York Times reported.

Obama is expected to announce the plan, which officials said would include a broad new role for the Fed to oversee large companies, ahead of the G-20 summit in early April.

If our government can regulate compensation for banks and insurance companies partially owned by the government, why not banks and insurance companies that did not get bailout money?  After all, best to have a say in these companies too since clearly they are out of control and it’s only a matter of time before we’ll need to bail them out.  Plus, it levels the playing field, right?

You know, this oversight thing looks like a great idea… why limit ourselves to banks and insurance companies.  There is so much greed on Wall Street we need to make sure their employees are not getting way overpaid.  After all, someone needs to make sure compensation is fair and equitable.

But now we have a problem, don’t we.  Doesn’t seem fair to target one sector of the economy… no, not fair at all.

Nope, as much as it pains us to admit it, we can not trust any of the greedy, money grabbing corporations to determine compensation for their employees.  Clearly, the time has come for a national pay scale, set by Congress and enforced by our federal government.  Never again will the hard workers of American be forced into virtual slavery to enrich the elite who do nothing but stuff their pockets while stepping on the fallen heroes of our economy.

But, there are so many companies it would be nearly impossible to provide oversight solely from Washington, and that’s where the unions come in.  We will take full advantage of the unions to be the eyes and ears of the federal government.  Since this will require that every company be unionized so that no stone is left unturned, henceforth all companies granted the privilege of operating within the borders of this great country will be required to unionize, no exceptions.

Then and only then will the Democratic Republic of America be a fair country where all citizens truly have an equal opportunity to share in prosperity and the happiness that comes from the truths that are self evident, that all are created equal and to each an equal share.

Update:  Right after posting this article, saw this on the Fox News website:

“We have to level the playing field,” Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, told “FOX News Sunday,” about the decision to tax executive bonuses at 90 percent at firms getting federal bailout funds.

Ah… there we have it.. we must level the playing field.

More insight over at Gina Cobb: You Earn Too Much (or Will Someday) . . . and Now Congress Will Fix That

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

What law has been broken?

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

What gives Barney Frank, Andrew Cuomo and all of these other windbags the right to demand the names of the AIG execs who received bonuses.  Who cares if we don’t like the fact that they got these bonuses, what law did they break?  Did they have a contract that promised them a bonus?  Did they fulfill their end of the bargain? Yes and yes.  So what gives any of us the right to interfere with that?

It’s frankly none of our business who got these bonuses.  If you want to go after the company for the money, fine, but even that is not very logical since money is fungible.  How do we even know which money is going where?  Take back the $165m and do what, spend it on research into the mating ritual of the jackass.

Want to subpoena someone.. how about Dodd?  How about Frank?  How about Geithner?

The Democrats, and some Republicans, are turning this whole thing into a class war.  Make too much money, we will confiscate it.  Even heard one Democrat, not sure if she is a senator or representative, say she wishes she could tax them 1,000 percent.  What the hell is that?

How dare they knowingly disregard the US Constitution to attempt to pass a law to retroactively take back the bonuses.

How dare they, with Barney Frank and Gary Ackerman leading the way, dismiss concerns for the safety of these American citizens and demand that their names be released to the public.

How dare they stand before congress, one after the other, and call these AIG execs despicable, scum, disgraceful simply because they accepted money they were entitled to under the contract they signed.

How dare all of these hypocrites complain when not one of them is turning back their salary, not one of them is declining the pay raise they just received, the vast majority of them are accepting taxpayer money for wasteful pet projects, and some of them even accepted money directly from AIG.  Have they done anything to earn a raise?

You know what I find disgusting?  Our “leaders” in congress, our president and politicians like Cuomo who are purposefully trying to divide this country to further their own agenda.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Quick Link: How to destroy the economy in a few easy steps

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

Excellent summary from Gina Cobb here.

Excerpt:

Step 1: Notice that banks don’t make as many loans to some groups of people as they do to others.

Step 2: Stir up envy. This has the benefit of helping to ensure one’s own re-election.

Step 3: Impugn the motives of profit-making financial institutions. Decide that the bankers’ loan decisions must be based on discrimination rather than based on legitimate lending criteria.

Step 4: Require by law that banks make loans to weak borrowers who may not be able to repay the loans. When warned that the government program backing these loans is financially unsound, dismiss such warnings.

Step 5: When banks begin to fail, keep the same regulations in effect and blame the banks.

Visit the Gina Cobb’s site to see the rest of the steps.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

AIG scandal exposes liars, hypocrites, frauds… and that’s just the senate

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Democrat Senator Chris Dodd Tuesday regarding language added to the stimulus bill last month that exempted all executive bonuses made before February 11, 2009 (from Fox News):

“When the language went to the conference and came back, there was different language,” he said then. “I can tell you this much, when my language left the Senate, it did not include it. When it came back, it did.”

Democrat Senator Chris Dodd Wednesday regarding language added to the stimulus bill last month that exempted all executive bonuses made before February 11, 2009:

“As many know, the administration was, among others, not happy with the language. They wanted some modifications to it.  They came to us, our staff, and asked for changes, and the changes at the time did not seem that obnoxious or onerous.”

Dodd said the argument put forward by Treasury was that a “flood of lawsuits” would come forward if the change was not made.

When asked how administration officials have this kind of leverage over members of Congress, Dodd said, “The administration has veto power…No one suggested a veto to me, I don’t want to imply that to you. But certainly that’s not an insignificant tool.”

So, Dodd has essentially admitted he lied when he said he had nothing to do with the language that exempted the bonuses, and as a bonus, he implicated the Obama administration as the impetus behind this change.

That’s at least two liars.

All of the righteous indignation the administration and congress is currently spreading over the airways… now that we know they knew about this all along… that’s fraud.

Hypocrites?  Oh yeah.   Where shall we begin…

How about complaining that failed executives would dare accept a bonus while seeing nothing wrong with accepting a congressional pay raise after, at the very least, contributing to this economic mess and arguably being the major cause.

How about the wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth over the use of $165m of tax payer dollars to pay these bonuses, no small piece of change for sure, only a few short days after dismissing criticism over the pork laden stimulus and omnibus bills as petty bickering over mere millions of dollars in a billion, even trillion, dollar world.

How about complaining about the treatment of terrorists under the Bush administration then completely dismissing concern for the safety of AIG execs, who apparently have been threatened with such humanitarian punishment as hanging with piano wire.

Yep, this AIG scandal is exposing all sorts of liars, hypocrites and frauds…  keep that in mind in 2010.

By the way, while we can be glad Dodd has come clean on this, let’s not forget that this stimulus package was pushed through by Pelosi, Reid, nearly every Democrat, a few Republicans and KP Obama… no wonder they didn’t want anyone to read it first.

You want to be outraged about something, don’t direct your anger at the execs that are receiving the bonus.  Admit it, if you were getting this bonus you wouldn’t give it back either.  Get angry at Congress and Obama for not only allowing this to happen.. they made it happen.

Update:  Almost forgot…  as angry as Dodd and KP Obama are over these execs getting bonuses from AIG, I haven’t heard anything about them returning any of the campaign donations they received from AIG.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share