Archive for the ‘Palin’ Category

More thoughts on a third Party

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Here’s my thinking (understanding that this is pure speculation based upon very little evidence, a long shot to say the least, and may be something I’ll regret writing after the cobwebs clear from hitting my head on something in the shed last night) …

At this point, assuming Palin does aspire to higher office, she is swimming up a waterfall in the Republican party (especially after her recent announcement), but still appears to have retained support in the more conservative circles of the Party.   She speaks of a higher calling and uniting the country along conservative lines.  This would be quite challenging with the current leadership in the Republican Party which appears more inclined to try to just be less liberal than the Democrats.

So, for her, a new Party might be the way to go… but I don’t think she has the cred to go that route on her own.

Enter Gingrich, who also appears to be looking to drive solutions to our country’s issues from a clearly more conservative perspective than the current Republican Party. Gingrich brings experience, knowledge, a slew of ideas to the table, but would have a hard time getting the Republican nomination in this environment.

So… is the incentive there, is the timing right, is there a predefined “conservative leadership” in place?

Might this be the right time for a viable third party?

Viewed another way:  If it is true that the Democratic Party has moved sharply to the left, if it is true that the Republican Party is moving closer to the “center left”, then either we need to believe the political center of this country has moved to the left or we must concede that the folks towards the right of center are growing in numbers as the “center” shifts left.

If the former, no adjustment is necessary because we are, together, moving to the left.

If the latter, then this shift to the left by both major parties opens up a void where a large ready-made constituency will be available for a third party, right of center, that has the necessary leadership to convince people that they are not just throwing away votes if they turn their backs on the Dems and the Reps.

Gingrich and Palin may just be in the right place at the right time to break the stranglehold the Democrats and Republicans have on our country’’s political process and provide us with a third option that isn’t just “none of the above”.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Quick Thought: Time for a viable third party?

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

Just thinkin’… any chance Palin and Gingrich break off from the Republican Party and form a viable third party?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Hollywood goes too far

Saturday, October 25th, 2008

There was a time in this country when we supported our candidates for president and vice president, disagreed with our neighbors or friends perhaps, but respected each other’s right to do so.

Now I’m not going to make believe I don’t have a strong opinion and voice it here, but I don’t attack people personally, at least I believe I haven’t.  That might change a bit in this post.

But the folks in Hollywood, the ones with those big megaphones that allow them to voice their opinions in a way that almost everyone can hear them, they’ve gone way too far.

You want to support Obama? Good for you; that’s your right and I respect your decision… I believe you are wrong, but you have that right.

But some of these loons in Hollywood, the folks that want me to watch them on TV, go to theaters, buy their DVDs, some of these folks have crossed the line, and not just by a few inches.

You can’t call the person I support for president or the person I support for vice president the things they have been called them without essentially saying you believe I’m an idiot. 

I can watch a movie or some silly TV show where the “star” disagrees with me, no problem.  But if my reaction to that “star” is anger because of the memory of how terrible they behaved towards my candidate, no way I can relax and be entertained.  The result, there are some folks who I will never be able to watch any movie, any TV show, and play, heck even any commercial with them in it and I would go so far as to say that any company whose product they endorse can forget about getting a dime from me too.

I’ll be compiling my own list over the next couple of weeks; might share it here.  First on my list is one of the “stars” of a show I enjoy watching with my son: Heroes.  Well, that show is off my list now thanks to this young <censored>,  Hayden Panettiere, who has no clue and owes John McCain, a true American hero who has done more for this country than she can ever hope to accomplish, an apology:

YouTube Preview Image

Watching this video again… grrrr… I won’t say what I’m thinking.

A piece of advise: dump the cheerleader, save the show.

Others come to mind, some who I wouldn’t watch even if they supported McCain since they have no real talent, like Pam Anderson.  Matt Damon, talented guy, but an idiot who believes dinosaurs walked the Earth 4,000 years ago. 

Some, like Ellen, are not so bad, they just don’t really appear to know all the issues.  For example, Ellen is opposed to Palin because Palin is opposed to gay marriage, yet she is not opposed to Biden who also is opposed to gay marriage.  So is that really why she doesn’t like Palin or is she just trying to steer votes Obama’s way?  Which is fine… but let’s try to be intellectually honest about it.

Again… support your candidate, even have an intelligent discussion on why you think the other gut would be bad for the country, but vulgar personal attacks… well, I suppose most of these folks wouldn’t be actors if they actually could form an intelligent, cohesive argument without a staff of writers.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Media Bias: Dems speak out

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

The bias in the press is getting so blatantly obvious and over the top, it’s irritating folks on both sides of the aisle.  A free press is one of the cornerstones of our country.  Hard to be free when you are in someone’s pocket.

I like Kirsten Powers.  Don’t often agree with her, but I always get the sense she is being fair.  My respect for her has increased after reading this article in the NY Post:

Barack Obama’s choice of Joe Biden as his running mate prompted a small wave of warnings about Biden’s propensity for gaffes. But no one imagined even in a worse-case scenario such a spectacular bomb as telling donors Sunday to “gird your loins” because a young president Obama will be tested by an international crisis just like young President John Kennedy was.

Scary? You betcha! But somehow, not front-page news.

Again the media showed their incredible bias by giving scattered coverage of Biden’s statements.

There were a few exceptions. On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” co-host Mika Brzezinski flipped incredulously through the papers, expressing shock at the lack of coverage of Biden’s remarks. Guest Dan Rather admitted that if Palin had said it, the media would be going nuts.

So what gives?

The stock answer is: “It’s just Biden being Biden.” We all know how smart he is about foreign policy, so it’s not the same as when Sarah Palin says something that seems off.

Yet, when Biden asserted incorrectly in the vice-presidential debate that the United States “drove Hezbollah out of Lebanon,” nobody in the US media shrieked. (It was, however, covered with derision in the Middle East.) Or when he confused his history by claiming FDR calmed the nation during the Depression by going on TV, the press didn’t take it as evidence that he’s clueless.

And Biden is the foreign-policy gravitas on the Democratic ticket, so his comments are actually even more disconcerting.

The outakes of his Sunday remarks don’t begin to capture the magnitude of what he said. After warning the crowd that there would be some sort of international incident – Biden could think of four or five scenarios – he told the donors: “We’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”

What does that mean? Obama’s election would provoke an international incident because of his inexperience and even Obama’s biggest supporters won’t be reassured by his response?

Then there were Biden’s predictions on the economy: “I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, ‘Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? . . . Why is this thing so tough? . . . I’m asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point, because you’re going to have to reinforce us.

“There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, ‘Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don’t know about that decision.’ ”

Biden is teling us that, at a time when Americans need to feel confidence in their government, they will be going “Oh my God.” Not a great message.

Needless to say, if Sarah Palin said this about a McCain administration, the media world would be exploding.

Whether you believe Biden is exaggerating, as he is known to do, or is providing real insight, the double standard in the media does even more damage to their lagging brand.

Part of the problem is their “Obama love,” but we’re also seeing the media elite’s belief – prejudice – that anyone with an R behind their name is dumb. So, if they say something dumb, they must be dumb. A Democrat, like Biden, can make wildly inaccurate or outrageous comments and they are ignored because the TV and press insiders feel they “know who he really is.”

On the stump recently, Sen. Biden declared he had “three words” for what the nation needs: “J-O-B-S.”

Lucky for him, his name isn’t Dan Quayle, or that would have followed him for the rest of his career.

Apologies for pasting the entire article, but there was no fluff…   minor correction though, Biden said “three letter word”.

There have been many other mistakes Biden has made that have been ignored, but Powers made the point very well… Biden and Obama have been given a free pass while McCain and Palin can’t even buy a break from the media.

Another great article here: Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn on the Lights? (h/t to Valerie).  The author, Orson Scott Card, is also Democrat.. check out his bio here.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Left vs. Right – There is a Difference

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

Oh sure, there are folks on the extreme right that would scare the heck out of anyone.  But these folks are marginalized on the right. 

I think many on the right are driven by fear this election, not hatred.  Fear of a one party government with no checks and balances supported by a one party press, fear of an inexperienced president leading us into a stealth welfare state, fear that the compromise and debate that keeps our country centered will give way to a sharp tilt to the left.

Think of our country as a ship.  We can sail choppy seas as long as we stay level and on a relatively even keel, but list to far left or right and the ship will likely capsize and sink.

On the left, extreme behavior is tolerated, sometimes even accepted and embraced. 

Often this extreme behavior is employed to suppress speech, to intimidate, or to just flat out explode in fits of rage to release years of hatred against who knows what.  They are irrational, believe in conspiracies, and now they have a savior, so don’t you dare stand in his way.

Here’s the latest example:

YouTube Preview Image 

Some older examples of irrational hatred from the far left loons.  I can’t include some of the worst ones because they are so vulgar, for example, I’m not including video of the “C” word t-shirts:

YouTube Preview Image

Hey Matt.. Palin was “only” a governor.. what was Obama?  This guy thinks there were dinosaurs 4,000 years ago (there weren’t.. hope you knew that).  Rest easy Matt, Palin believes in dinosaurs and didn’t ban books:

YouTube Preview Image

Hates Palin and her accent:

YouTube Preview Image

Hates McCain and thinks someone should explain Vietnam to him (real genius this one). The funniest thing is he questions the intelligence of people who vote for McCain:

YouTube Preview Image

I like the show Heroes, but this ad has me seriously considering dropping it from my viewing schedule just because it is so annoying.  Caution, Hayden Panettiere uses language some may find offensive, but no worse than you’d hear on any street corner:

YouTube Preview Image

The point, although these are relatively tame, is there is irrational hatred driving folks to support Obama for president.  I don’t hate Obama, in fact I pray he will be a great president if elected, but I certainly fear the direction he will take us, and I fear even more an unchecked government controlled in total by either party.

Here’s a recent example of how the press treats McCain/Palin different than Obama/Biden… and admits it (h/t Hot Air via  The Patriot Room):

 

Let’s end on an up note and take a look at the objects of all this hatred – the tribute by Fred Thompson and Sarah Palin’s convention speech:

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

AP playing race card?

Saturday, October 18th, 2008

AP still going out of it’s way to find reasons to turn voters against McCain & Palin.  The latest article accuses Palin of being racist because, of the 240 members of her administration in Alaska who have identified their ethnicity, 8 are black and 49 are Alaskan Native.

Well, let’s see, that would be 3.3% black, 20.4% Alaskan Native.

According to census figures, Alaska has a population of 3.7% black (AP rounded this up to 4%) and 15.4% Alaskan Native (AP reported this as 18%).

Seems like the diversity of her administration pretty much mirrors the general population…

Not bothering to link to the AP article, clearly just another AP hit piece.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Not that there’s anything wrong with it…

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

You know… we get to vote for whoever we want to vote for and we get to vote for them for whatever reason we want to vote for them for.

Personally, I vote based upon issues, character and confidence that the person can do the job.

Others might vote for a candidate based upon party affiliation, and there are certainly those who will vote for or against someone based upon race, gender, religion, height, hair, weight… just about anything.

You and I may think another person’s reason for voting for one candidate over another is nuts, but it is their right to use any criteria they consider important.

So when folks complain that there are some (many?) Americans that will cast their vote based upon the race of the candidate, I may find that appalling, but they are well within their rights.

That being said, here is an example of some folks who are clearly voting based solely upon race and, while I respect their right to do so, their decision to do so proves that racism is alive and well and that some folks, clueless about the issues, are just casting a race based vote:

YouTube Preview Image

Thanks to Blogs4McCain for finding this clip.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share