Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should…
Wednesday, February 6th, 2008Wow! What a temptation:
AP 2/5/2008 - … The process aims to create healthy embryos for couples to avoid passing on genes carrying diseases.
The genes being replaced are the mitochondria, a cell’s energy source, which are contained outside the nucleus in a normal female egg. Mistakes in the mitochondria’s genetic code can result in serious diseases like muscular dystrophy, epilepsy, strokes and mental retardation.
Imagine… the potential to wipe out genetic disorders. This would be to our generation what vaccines and antibiotics were to prior generations.
There it is… right there… take it…
The temptation is incredible; maybe it really is the right thing to do. But the method just doesn’t seem right:
British scientists say they have created human embryos containing DNA from two women and a man in a procedure that researchers hope might be used one day to produce embryos free of inherited diseases.
Though the preliminary research has raised concerns about the possibility of genetically modified babies, the scientists say that the embryos are still only primarily the product of one man and one woman.
“We are not trying to alter genes, we’re just trying to swap a small proportion of the bad ones for some good ones,” said Patrick Chinnery, a professor of neurogenetics at Newcastle University involved in the research.
This is a tough one. We are “creating” babies that will be free of inherited diseases. We are “creating” babies… creating babies… should we be creating babies? With DNA from two women mixed in a test tube with DNA from one man? Just don’t seem right… then again… a cure for genetic disorders?
What if the improvement to the genetic make-up of the embryo meant mixing DNA from one woman, one man, and a frog? Would that be OK? Where’s the line?
Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should… but the temptation is incredible, it really is…


