Click Here for Unemployment Chart 1
 
Click Here for Unemployment Chart 2
 
Click Here for Stimulus Jobs Results
 

I hate viruses, then again…

January 9th, 2010

First it was H1N1 knocking me out of action.  That was followed by a very annoying, hard to kill, malicious Trojan that infected the MBR on my PC (which prompted many friends to remind me how great Macs are) and tied up much of my time for about 3 weeks.

While both viruses contributed to a lack of posts here, the lack of posts here contributed to a chance to consider if there is any real purpose to continuing with Thinkin’Bout Stuff in it’s current form.. or at all.

Nearly four years ago Thinkin’Bout Stuff transition from a basic website to this blog format with this initial post:

A drop in a cup can create a splash… a drop in a pond… ripples.  A drop in an ocean likely no more than an impression swiftly swept away by waves of opinions formed through the collective wind of thousands of blogs all shouting to be heard over the roar of the ocean of ideas.

Will this drop be any different than the millions of others it joins? I have no idea… wait.. I mean, I have an idea, just no idea if any ideas shared here will amount to anything above an impression.  Who knows, maybe we’ll see a ripple or two, maybe not, but at least it may keep me out of therapy.

A drop in an ocean of ideas really is quite insignificant.

Sometimes, especially when RealClearPolitics provided an opportunity for smaller blogs to get exposure under “reader submitted articles”, we had pretty good traffic here.  These days, not so much.

Folks like to stop by to check out the unemployment charts, occasionally something posted here gets a link back to someone who either agrees or thinks I’m nutz, there was even some fun with a radio host who called me a wingnut.

But mostly I’m pretty much talking to myself.   Don’t misunderstand me… this blog is a great way to vent, but shouting ideas in the middle of this ocean with no one listening seems kind of pointless.

To be continued?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Franken or Pelosi… who has more class?

December 17th, 2009

Was about to write about Nancy Pelosi, then saw this clip of Al Franken acting like the mean-spirited, condescending, asshole that he is and couldn’t decide which to write about, so decided to not decide and write about both:

First … this guy is the most junior senator in the Senate.  Why on Earth is he chairing ANYTHING?

Second…  it has been many years since I served as the parliamentarian for an organization or brushed up on Robert’s Rules of Order, but I believe Franken was out of order; before he can speak or object as a member he must first step down from the chair

Third… what a disrespectful, mean-spirited, condescending, self-absorbed, egotistical, self-important little twit!  Senator Lieberman requested a couple of minutes to finish his statement, a request that is always agreed to without objection out of respect and courtesy among senators, and this low-life injects his brand of sarcastic disdain for anyone to the right of Fidel Castro into one of the most respected and formal institutions in our government.

As predicted, Al Franken is an embarrassment to our country and to the people of Minnesota who elected him.

Speaking of left-wing partisans… Nancy Pelosi.

In October of 2008 Nancy Pelosi said:

“Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more bipartisan,” said Pelosi.

Seem more bipartisan to you?  Maybe she meant twice-as-partisan.

The latest example of her bipartisanship is with the congressional delegation in Copenhagen.  Apparently there was a press conference held today and someone forgot to invite the Republicans.  In fact, the Republicans were denied access to the press conference.

When asked about this obvious partisan play, in a foreign country where we expect our “leaders” to leave domestic politics behind, Pelosi said the Republicans were welcome to hold their own press conference.

Way to show a united front, one America, indivisible, under God…  guess there really are two Americas as that Democrat icon John Edwards told us years ago.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Obama ready to borrow $10B/year to give to “developing” countries

December 17th, 2009

Let’s say you go to a rather generous banker and borrow a million dollars.  As a newly minted millionaire, you decide to be generous and give away all of your money.  No worries, next year you can just borrow another million dollars and give that away too.

You can do this over and over again because… you’re rich!

Except for one minor technicality.. you still need to pay back the generous banker… with interest.

Sound like a good plan to you?

Apparently President Obama thinks this is a logical and fiscally sound approach to global citizenship:

FoxNews - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters in Copenhagen the United States is willing to commit up to $10 billion a year by 2012, and would support a global fund of $100 billion a year to help developing nations deal with climate change, provided the nations here are willing live up to the ‘transparency’ demanded by the U.S.

$10 billion per year, money we do not have, paid to “developing nations”.  Like China… who just happens to be America’s generous banker.

So… we are promising to borrow money from China so we can send money to China and other developing countries so that those countries will agree to reduce CO2 emissions.

Nothing wrong with that plan…

No worries though… President Obama knows where he can get that money to pay back our bankers.  All us rich Americans, and our kids, and their kids, and their kids will be happy to pay a large chunk of our pay checks so that we will one day live in a world where people no longer live in fear of CO2.

In fact, we can all do our part here… please refrain from breathing out.  It’s not your fault really, you can’t help yourself.  As long as you breath out you release CO2 into the air and contribute to global warming.  No one is suggesting you stop breathing in… just don’t breath out.

Thank you for your support…

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Can the government create real jobs really?

December 16th, 2009

Let’s say you have five kids.  Four have jobs, one doesn’t.

You feel bad the fifth doesn’t have a job, so you take 25% of the income from the four employed kids and “hire” the fifth kid to do shovel ready projects around the house.

Does the fifth kid really have a real job now?  Is it self-sustaining?  How long before the other four kids get tired of paying the fifth kid?

Of course it’s not a real job…

When our government makes temporary jobs to hire people for shovel ready jobs, jobs that are not self-sustaining,  jobs that can only exist as long as people with real jobs are able to pay for these jobs out of their own pockets… these aren’t real jobs either.

The Pelosi controlled House has passed a “jobs” bill:

FoxNews - President Obama’s Democratic allies in the House have muscled through a year-end measure aimed at creating jobs through a second round of stimulus spending.

According to documents released by Democrats, the measure would cost $154 billion. But there’s also another $20 billion from the federal treasury to keep the highway trust fund afloat.

The bill is funded partly with unused money from the government’s unpopular Wall Street bailout program called the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The bill redirects $75 billion in that fund to infrastructure and job investments to further stabilize the economy.

Ummm.. wasn’t that TARP money supposed to be repaid to us after it was no longer needed to save the country from imminent ruin?

This is nothing more than transferring money from the pockets of those who have jobs to the pockets of those who don’t.

Not that it is a bad thing to help folks out, but wouldn’t they be better served by stimulating the private job market so that there are self-sustaining jobs out there?

How do we expect private industry to afford to hire new employees if they keep having to send more money to the government to hire government workers?

The method utilized by this Democratic controlled government is an anemic attempt to address unemployment in the short term that will result in a extended weakness in the economy, extended weakness in the real job market, increased debt and taxes, and ultimately inflation and high interest rates.

Other than that… a great idea.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

We had a choice in 2006…

December 16th, 2009

We chose change.  Before the election of 2008, before Barack Obama, before the decision to “fundamentally change the United States of America”… we the people had already decided to change the leadership in the US Senate and the US House.  Back in 2006, Thinkin’Bout Stuff produced a political ad that received some good press but little exposure (no clue how folks get their videos to go viral).

The video ask why we would want change when we were experiencing record stock prices, low unemployment, low interest rates, record home ownership, real wages up and inflation low, steadily declining gas prices and lower income taxes.

It asked why we would want change when we had gone without an attack on American soil (including US embassies and ships at sea) since 9/11, national crime rates were down, Saddam Hussein, Uday, Qusay, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi all gone, Muammar Qaddafi denouncing terrorism and nukes, Osama bin Laden in hiding.

But we wanted a change.  Two years later, we apparently wanted even more change… in the same direction.

So.. how’s that working out for us?

Stock prices since 2006 took a major hit before recovering…  many folks took a major hit in their 401k plans and had to delay retirement.

Unemployment?  The rate has more than doubled.  Back in 2006 the Democrats were telling us 4.5% unemployment was unacceptable and we needed change… who knew they meant it was too low.

Interest rates are still low, but home ownership by folks who could not afford the homes they purchased with high-risk loans, with the encouragement of folks like Barney Frank, led to foreclosures and a crash in the housing market.

Real wages are down, inflation is on the horizon as the US dives deeper into debt, gas prices have climbed, and income taxes are going up next year as tax cuts expire.

On the security front, Iran is about to have a nuke and a delivery system, Afghanistan and Pakistan think we are pulling out in 18 months so they are trying to avoid annoying the Taliban… who we believe continue to harbor bin Ladan, the threat from North Korea and even Venezuela is growing, terrorists are being granted the same rights as US citizens and civil trials, and we have had a terrorist attack on a military base right here in the United States that our president refuses to treat as a terrorist attack despite mounting evidence.

Well done…

Next year, I actually agree with the folks who believe we need to make a change in our leadership…. no matter who we elect, it’s hard to imagine they could do worse than this crew.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Federal judge sides with ACORN, clearly nuts

December 11th, 2009

Just saw this news report from AP on FoxNews:

A federal judge has ruled the U.S. government’s move to cut off funding to ACORN is unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Nina Gershon issued the preliminary injunction against the government Friday. She ruled that it is in the public’s interest for the organization to continue receiving federal funding.

ACORN claimed in its lawsuit that Congress’ decision to cut off its funding was unconstitutional because it punitively targeted an organization.

A lawyer for ACORN says the decision sends a sharp message to Congress that it can’t single out an individual or organization without due process.

What they are essentially claiming here is that Congress passed a Bill of Attainder directed at ACORN:

A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial.

I’m no lawyer, but since when is it considered punishment to refuse to fund an organization or person?  Does that mean every other organization that Congress chooses to not spend our tax dollars on can claim they are being singled out and punished?

This is a ridiculous ruling, this judge is wrong, and this will get reversed if our government bothers to appeal it… be interesting to see if they do appeal since they probably like the idea of being “forced” to fund ACORN.  That way they can fund this bunch of crooks and say they had no choice, the judge made them do it.

This ruling does send a sharp message though… government spending is so out of control, organizations can now claim an inalienable right to our money.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Update 2: SEUI vs Volunteers

November 29th, 2009

An update from the Allentown Morning Call yesterday on the dispute between SEIU and the Boy Scout working on his Eagle project:

Hauling brush and old tires out of the woods in Allentown early Friday, members of the Service Employees International Union learned an Eagle-Scout-to-be is just as forgiving as he is trustworthy, loyal and helpful.

<snip>

To show there were no hard feelings, SEIU members from as far away as Philadelphia and New Jersey accepted Kevin’s invitation to help with the project Friday.

”They completely agreed — to come out, to help, to make amends,” said Kevin, a member of Troop 301 of Center Valley. ”I’m just glad it’s all coming together.”

As a result of the extra attention, Kevin found himself in charge of at least 40 volunteers, including Boy Scouts, parents, union members, a few Girl Scouts and the mayor of Bethlehem.

<snip>

Wayne MacManiman, who leads the SEIU’s Philadelphia-based mid-Atlantic district, said he thought Kevin’s invitation was a great idea.

”Everybody’s here on their day off, volunteering,” said MacManiman, of Burlington County, N.J. He noted SEIU members from Allentown had signed up to be part of the union’s 20-member crew.

Regardless of the motive of SEUI leadership, whether to make amends or fix a public relations nightmare, the folks who volunteered their time on a day off should be commended.  Stating the obvious, or at least something that should be obvious, it is much better to see Americans working together than attacking each other.

Perhaps SEUI leaders and members will take a lesson from this clear contrast between bullying and community outreach.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share