Click Here for Unemployment Chart 1
 
Click Here for Unemployment Chart 2
 
Click Here for Stimulus Jobs Results
 

Updated Unemployement Charts – How’s that Stimulus Bill Working Out?

May 10th, 2010

The unemployment charts (links on top of this page) have been updated with the most recent data.

The first chart shows that, for folks 20 and over, there is still a big gap between the unemployment rate of men and women.  Probably a logical explanation for this if you take the time to dig through the data…  types of work men typically do being hit harder? Men being targets because of higher salaries compared to women?

Second is a straightforward unemployment rate chart for 16yrs and older.

Third chart had to change this time around because of available data on the Bureau of Labor Statistics site.  The data I was using appears to be gone, but I did find data focused on non-farm jobs in the private sector… so I replaced all months with this new data.

This third chart uses February 2009 as the baseline, when we were promised the stimulus bill would create 3,500,000 new jobs by 2011.  This chart extends to December 2011 to give the folks in power the entire year of 2011 to accomplish this task.

Unfortunately, we have lost jobs since the start of the stimulus, so the stimulus now needs to create 6,871,000 jobs by the end of 2011 to reach the total of 3,500,000 promised. That is an average of 343,550 new jobs per month, every month, between now and the end of 2011.

Seems a bit unlikely…

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Was HS Principal Wrong to Schedule Blacks-Only Class Trip?

May 6th, 2010

News item:

From FoxNews: Michigan Elementary School Principal Investigated for Blacks-Only Class Trip

An elementary school principal in Michigan is under investigation for authorizing a field trip last week for 30 black students to meet with an African-American rocket scientist. Students who are not black were excluded from the outing — a possible violation of a state law that bans racial favoritism in public schools.

The principal, Mike Madison, who is black, said the trip was part of an effort to close the achievement gap between black and white students.

I think the principal had good intentions.

If we lived in a country, and a time, where race was not used as a means to gain power and race baiting was not just another career path… perhaps this would not be such a big deal.

But we live in a time and place where race is used to demonize political opponents; where many believe equality is an end state instead of a starting point; where political correctness is so out of control that a law to help catch people in this country illegally is immediately twisted by the press, pundits and our president into a oppressive, racist attack based upon skin color.

As a result, even the best intentions can run afoul of the race police… the rub here is that folks are learning that this particular blade cuts both ways.

This would be a completely different news story if a white principal had schedule a whites only trip to meet with Larry Bird as a means to encourage them to aspire to play in the NBA…  President Obama would have already made three off the cuff snide remarks and invited Al Sharpton and Bird to the White House for a beer with that principal.

But this story, which might not even have been news a few years ago, is news today, not because what this principal did was necessarily wrong, but precisely because what he did would not be acceptable if this were an all white trip and folks are plain tired of the double standard.

If what he did is, in my view, not wrong… it was not as right as it could be.

What if the same exact trip were scheduled but half the students were white?  Aside from avoiding the potential for dividing his student body along racial lines, there would be the added benefit of exposing the white students to this successful rocket scientist who happens to be black.

Was the trip to meet and learn from a rocket scientist or a black rocket scientist?  Either way, wouldn’t the white students benefit?   If there was a belief that the black students would benefit from meeting a successful black scientist, why wouldn’t the white students also benefit.. in fact, would that not benefit everyone in the end if one of the goals was to drop the race barrier?

The principal believes he has learned a lesson from this trip and would have done more to educate the parents prior to the trip…  but I don’t believe that is the lesson to be learned here.

The lesson is that we do more to advance towards a color blind society when adults, even if they themselves are not color blind, behave as if they are for the benefit of the children.

That means not selecting students for trips, clubs, proms, sports, or anything based upon their race… class dismissed.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Quick Thought: Isn’t it treason?

May 6th, 2010

It really doesn’t seem that complicated to me.

Faisal Shahzad is an American citizen.

Faisal Shahzad is accused of planting a bomb in Times Squre to kill Americans.

Faisal Shahzad is accused of acting in coordination with an enemy of the United States.

Therefore….

Faisal Shahzad should be tried for treason:

A person commits the crime of treason if he levies war against his state or country or sides to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Treason is a crime under federal and some state laws. Treason is made a high crime, punishable by death, under federal law by Article III, section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

Yep… sure sounds like treason to me.

Am I missing something?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Remembering the good old days of “high unemployment”

May 5th, 2010

Remembering the good old days when Dems criticized Bush for huge unemployment rates…

On the Hill – June 6, 2008 – The Democratic Congress is working to address the faltering economy, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi charges, blaming President Bush for fiscal woes as the unemployment rate increased to 5.5 percent.

“The New Direction Congress will send the President legislation to provide urgently needed assistance to millions of Americans who have lost their jobs and are struggling to make ends meet,” Pelosi adds. “Just as we worked cooperatively in passing a stimulus plan to put $117 billion into the hands of more than 130 million Americans, we urge the President to support legislation to address the needs of America’s unemployed and struggling workers. Today’s unemployment numbers demonstrate that this is an urgent challenge.”

Wow!  5.5%… who wouldn’t take that today?  Good to see Pelosi was tackling this as an urgent challenge two years ago…  a bit strange that it is no longer an urgent challenge now that we are close to 10%… guess she met her goal.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi March 7, 2003 – “President Bush’s first $1.7 trillion tax cut came with a promise — that it would create jobs and grow the economy. We all know that it has not. The rhetoric was good, but the reality couldn’t be more different. Today’s unemployment numbers show that 308,000 jobs were lost last month, the biggest one-month job loss in 18 months. Overall, President Bush has the worst record on job creation of any President in nearly 60 years.

“We need policies that create jobs. It is that simple. Democrats have proposed an economic stimulus package that nonpartisan observers say will create 1 million jobs this year, five times more than the Bush plan. President Bush’s policies have produced record job loss — Democrats propose policies that will create jobs. The choice for the American people is clear.”

The unemployment rate was 5.9% in February and March of 2003, unacceptable to Mrs. Pelosi.  For the record, the average rate under President Bush was 5.3% over 8 years; amazing when you factor in the major hit to the economy on 9/11.

So… how’s the Obama record?  Perhaps too soon to tell.  So let’s look at the Pelosi/Reid record.

When Pelosi, Reid and the Democrats took over congress in January 2007, the unemployment rate was down to 4.6% with a Republican president and congress. Today it is close to 10% and likely would be over that if not for the temporary census jobs inflating the employment figures.

But jobs are not job one with Reid, Pelosi and Obama.  First we need health care legislation, “stimulus” bills that are laden with pork, cap and trade, denial of the right to a secret ballot for folks voting on unionization…

Maybe they should look to some of the “failed policies” of the Bush administration to see if we can at least get back to the good old days of high unemployment rates like 5.5%.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

What’s next? Posting the launch codes on Facebook?

May 3rd, 2010

Interesting the things the Obama administration thinks should be kept secret and those that they think should be public knowledge.

  • Secret location of VP bunker… not a secret, slip of the VP tongue in 2009
  • True cost of the health care bill…  secret, at least until it was signed
  • Classified info on interrogation techniques…. not a secret, declassified in 2009
  • White House Social Secretary Desirée Rogers’ role in folks sneaking into presidential dinners… secret to the point of turning down a congressional invitation to testify because of the separation of powers
  • Classified US Cybersecurity Plan… not a secret, declassified in March 2010

And …  one of the most closely guarded secrets considered critical to our national security until now:

From AP - The Obama administration disclosed the size of its atomic stockpile going back to 1962 as part of a campaign to get other nuclear nations to be more forthcoming, and to improve its bargaining position against the prospect of a nuclear Iran.

“We think it is in our national security interest to be as transparent as we can be about the nuclear program of the United States,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told reporters at the United Nations.

Is that kind of like how announcing we were closing the detention center at Guantanamo was going to make us safer?  Someone should tell the terrorists now that we’ve had yet another attempted attack.

The U.S. has previously regarded such details as top secret.

Gee.. wonder why….

Whether to reveal the full total, including those thousands of nearly dead warheads, was debated within the Obama administration. Keeping those weapons out of the figure released Monday represented a partial concession to intelligence agency officials and others who argued national security could be harmed by laying the entire nuclear arsenal bare.

I’m sure that concession was comforting…

But the administration is not revealing everything.

The Pentagon figure released Monday includes deployed weapons, which are those more or less ready to launch, and reserve weapons. It does not include thousands of warheads that have been disabled or all but dismantled.

Oooo.. now there’s a secret we want to keep.  Let’s not tell them how many broken or useless warheads we have.  Need to keep the mystery around those.

Exposure of once-classified totals for U.S. deployed and reserve nuclear weapons is intended to nudge nations such as China, which has revealed little about its nuclear stockpile.

Yeah, let us know how that works out.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Liberal Vision: A Nation of Vampires

May 1st, 2010

As the Reid/Pelosi/Obama vision of America continues to materialize before our eyes, one thing is already very clear… an America dependent on government is a sustaining source of power for those who feed that dependency.

In a warped perversion of the old “trickle down” economics, far-left liberals are accelerating the flow of wealth with high powered siphons and are doing so without even trying to hide their disdain of those who supply the life-blood of our economy.

Impatient with voluntary trips to the economic blood bank by those who live and thrive in our economy, they have turned to vampirism and will greedily feed off the hosts until they are bled dry.

When 40% of the country not only pays zero income tax but actually receives a check from the government at tax time (that’s right, 40% of the country actually makes a profit on April 15), when 10% of the country pays 73% of all income taxes collected by the federal government, what we have is a major redistribution of wealth.

But even that is not enough for the far left, they want to expand the number of available hosts (declaring more of us to be rich in the process) and ramp up the flow from all available hosts to feed more of the vampire class and expand their base so that, in their minds, perpetual power will be within their reach.

Vlad would be proud.

The problem is that this is not sustainable.  When all hosts are bled dry, the economy will collapse and all will suffer, the vampires, the hosts… and those of us caught in the middle.

What works best for our country?

The same thing that has worked, albeit cyclically, for decades.

  • Those of us with lots of money who invest in our nation and fuel the engines that creates jobs
  • Those of us doing fairly well, buying lots of stuff and keep the economy afloat
  • Those of us getting by and working hard for a better life for our families
  • Those of us struggling that need our help
  • And.. a government that protects those of us who struggle while staying out of the way of the rest of us

When the government becomes the economy, the economy will collapse from the top down as the rich stop creating jobs, the well off and those getting by have no money to feed the economy, and finally those who are struggling no longer have the rest of us to help them out because we are standing beside them instead of reaching out with a helping hand.

A nation of vampires is doomed to a life in the shadows…

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Quick Thought: Obama is right on Iran

April 29th, 2010

President Obama has been right on Iran since way back… he’s also been wrong.  Just depends on which speech you recall.

Just wondering… do you think, as Iran is on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon and a delivery system… do you think he has locked into the view that Iran is a threat?  Even more than right wing Tea Party radicals and Arizona?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share