Click Here for Unemployment Chart 1
 
Click Here for Unemployment Chart 2
 
Click Here for Stimulus Jobs Results
 

Quick Thought: Az defense budget should include bus fare to SF

April 28th, 2010

So San Francisco feels so strongly that Arizona is being unfair to illegal immigrants that they are ready to boycott:

NBC - San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera on Monday called for a sweeping boycott of the state of Arizona and Arizona-based businesses.

“Just as it did two decades ago when it refused to observe Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Arizona has again chosen to isolate itself from the rest of the nation. Our most appropriate response is to assure that their isolation is tangible rather than merely symbolic. San Francisco should lead the way in adopting and aggressively pursuing a sweeping boycott of Arizona and Arizona-based businesses until this unjust law is repealed or invalidated. My office is fully committed to work with San Francisco city departments and commissions to identify all applicable contracts, and to pursue termination wherever possible. And my office stands ready to assist in any legal challenges in whatever way it can.”

Interesting how the controversy over MLK Day slipped in here.  Don’t want to go off on a tangent here, but there have been many great men in our history, Dr. King was one of them, should we have a day for each one?  Forget the cost to taxpayers, right?  Let’s just stick with the liberal side of the aisle.. where’s JFK Day, RFK Day? FDR Day?

But I digress…

If San Francisco is ready, willing and able to embrace this influx of immigrants, Arizona should set aside money to buy them bus tickets and send any arrested for non-violent crimes to SF where the will be welcomed with open arms.

Another problem solved…

By the way, what would hurt more…  SF boycotting Arizona, or the entire state of Arizona boycotting SF?

Just thinkin’…

Oh.. and funny how San Fran folks think Arizona folks are the ones who are isolated from the rest of the nation :-)

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Mexican Gov warns Mexicans over travel to Mexico…

April 27th, 2010

That certainly would make more sense than warning them about travel to Arizona… unless of course the warning is about illegal border crossing.

So Mexico, that bastion of due process and civil rights, is warning it’s citizens that travel to Arizona could be dangerous because, um… well, I’m not sure:

From AP - The Mexican government warned its citizens Tuesday to use extreme caution if visiting Arizona because of a tough new law that requires all immigrants and visitors to carry U.S.-issued documents or risk arrest.

And of course that arrest could lead to deportation back to Mexico, which is a very dangerous place these days… now it makes sense, that is clearly a high risk situation.  Totally justified.

Are they serious?  “Warning: Entering the United States illegally could lead to arrest”.  Really?  “Warning: Not having the appropriate identification when visiting the US could lead to detainment”…  right, that’s something worthy of warning.  Try visiting Mexico without appropriate documentation and see how that works out for you.

Certainly our president will stand up for the good citizens of Arizona who are victimized daily by waves of illegals crossing the border.  Certainly he can see why they need to do something to combat the abductions, killings, torture (no, not waterboarding, real torture):

From AP - Phoenix has also been dubbed the kidnapping capital of the U.S. amid a surge of extortion-related abductions tied to drugs and human smuggling. The city has averaged about a kidnapping a day in recent years — some resulting in torture and death. Victims’ legs have been burned with irons, their arms have been tied to the ceiling, their fingers broken with bricks.

That’s just one city.  One kidnapping a day! Torture… torture is bad right?  Our president will surely not stand for this.  He will recognize that their governor and their legislature had to act in the best interest of their citizens.

President Barack Obama also criticized the law, saying it could lead to harassment of Hispanics, and he called for bipartisan support to fix America’s broken immigration system. Two senior officials in his government said the Arizona law may face a legal challenge by federal authorities.

“Now suddenly if you don’t have your papers, and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you’re going to get harassed — that’s something that could potentially happen,” the U.S. president said of the measure. “That’s not the right way to go.”

Ah yes…  if you don’t have your papers you might get “harassed”.   Not unlike when you get harassed by the police if they catch you driving without a drivers license.  Perhaps we should repeal all laws that allow police to ask to see your drivers license.

But let’s go with that whole harassed thing for a moment since that is the focus of our president.  Does anyone recall him doing anything to assist Arizona address this crises? Yet he has no trouble weighing in on the side of the poor oppressed people who will need to carry a piece of paper to prove they are here legally.

Quick question:  Would you prefer to be “harassed” by a police officer asking to see some ID, or to be abducted, held for ransom, have your fingers broken with bricks, and killed?  That really a tough call for you?

I haven’t read this law, but if it is true that this law calls for checking IDs only after a primary violation (like speeding), how is this any different than asking to see your drivers license?

If it is true this law is essentially a state version of federal law, how can any of the protests by team Obama be anything but political?

I hope they do test this in the courts so we can all find out what is truth and what is propaganda.  In the meantime, maybe a bit less whining over folks being asked to produce ID and a bit more focus on catching the bad guys who are torturing US citizens might be a good idea.

As for that warning by the Mexican government about the risk associated with a trip to Arizona… right…  stay home where it’s safe.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Looks like Nancy Pelosi was right about the health care bill…

April 24th, 2010

She said they have to pass the health care bill so we can find out what’s in it:

So.. now we are starting to find out what’s in it.  And guess what… looks like it doesn’t lower health care costs after all.  Guess there wasn’t any time to figure this out before the bill was passed:

From AP -

Economic experts at the Health and Human Services Department concluded in a report issued Thursday that the health care remake will achieve Obama’s aim of expanding health insurance — adding 34 million to the coverage rolls.

But the analysis also found that the law falls short of the president’s twin goal of controlling runaway costs, raising projected spending by about 1 percent over 10 years. That increase could get bigger, since Medicare cuts in the law may be unrealistic and unsustainable, the report warned.

Where were these guys, where was this report, where was this data indicating costs would go up, not down… BEFORE the bill was passed?

If this comes as a surprise to Pelosi and Reid, shame on them for not knowing the impact of their bill before it was passed.

If this comes as no surprise to Pelosi and Reid, shame on them for lying to the American people.

Either way.. shame on them, and shame on us for allowing our country to be led by the far left minority of the Democratic Party…  shame on Democrats for choosing leadership so far outside the mainstream of American politics.   Shame on Republicans for not offering good alternatives until recently.  And shame on us again if we don’t vote for a shift away from the far left in November.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

GM Solved My Credit Card Problem!

April 23rd, 2010

I was impressed this week to see a commercial proclaiming that GM had repaid loans from the American people five years early.  Very impressive indeed, and surely a sign of economic recovery that this huge auto manufacturer was able to dig out of a hole and pay back what they owe.

Well…  maybe not.

From Senator Grassley’s note to Treasury Secretary Tim “TurboTax” Geithner”:

General Motors (GM) yesterday announced that it repaid its TARP loans. I am concerned, however, that this announcement is not what it seems. In fact, it appears to be nothing more than an elaborate TARP money shuffle.

On Tuesday of this week, Mr. Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for TARP, testified before the Senate Finance Committee. During his testimony Mr. Barofsky addressed GM’s recent debt repayment activity, and stated that the funds GM is using to repay its TARP debt are not coming from GM earnings. Instead, GM seems to be using TARP funds from an escrow account at Treasury to make the debt repayments. The most recent quarterly report from the Office of the Special Inspector General for TARP says “The source of funds for these quarterly [debt] payments will be other TARP funds currently held in an escrow account.”

<snip

In reality, it looks like GM merely used one source of TARP funds to repay another.

Wow!  This is a great idea and an example for all of us to follow.  Pay off your loans with a loan from the original lender.

In fact, from now on I plan to pay my credit card bill in total by using that same credit card…   no more worries about credit card bills for me.  They will be paid in full every month and it won’t cost me a dime.

Should be interesting to see how this plays out… perhaps there is a reasonable explanation.  If not, there is surely an explanation that will satisfy the kool aid drinkers among us.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Feeling safer yet?

April 6th, 2010

Interesting policy shift by team Obama:

From AP – “The U.S. promises not to use nuclear weapons against countries that don’t have them.”

In related news, the US promised to not use fighters and bombers against countries that have no air-force, ships against countries without a navy, only bombs of equal or lesser size of those available to our enemy will be used in any engagement, and to be fair, we will only deploy an equal or lesser number of soldiers into an engagement or, in the alternative, we will allow our players to switch sides to even things up.

After all, war should be fair.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

There he goes again…

January 28th, 2010

President Barack Obama believes in the pharaoh method when it comes to leading a nation, or at least as it was portrayed by Yul Brynner.

All he need do is say the word and the word becomes reality… “So it is written, so it shall be done“.

More than one year ago President Barack Obama proclaimed Guantanamo “will be closed no later than one year from now.”

Not might be closed, not we plan to close, not it is important we close, not targeted to close, not we hope it is closed, not barring any unforeseen circumstance beyond our control it will be closed…

No! “Will be closed no later than one year from now.”  Will be closed! So it is written, so it shall be done.

Not closed.

In August, President Obama commanded that a special high-value, detainee-interrogation group (HIG) be created to ensure appropriate handling and interrogation of terrorist suspects.  According to AP:

“The unit would be led by an FBI official, with a deputy director from somewhere in the government’s vast intelligence apparatus, and members from across agencies. It will be directly supervised by the White House, but the senior administration officials insisted the unit’s agency bosses will make operational decisions, not the White House.

Shouldn’t be too hard to pull together.  Need an FBI guy, some reps from other agencies, and a reporting mechanism to keep the White House in the loop.

I estimate it would take me no more than one week to pull together this team (but then, I am very good at managing projects and teams :-)

Seems like a pretty important team to pull together to close a major gap now that all of the Bush administration approaches to interrogation have been abandoned, so clearly President Obama would be on top of this and ensure this team is up and active and protecting the United States from the bad guys.

What’s that?  They don’t actually exist yet?  Did anyone tell the president? Oh, I see… no need.  All that matters is that something is announced… so it is written, so it shall be done!  Phew, this leading stuff is hard work.

Too bad though, since we’ve all ready had three attacks by terrorists here on US soil since President Obama was inaugurated, including the Christmas Eve Underwear Bomber.  An interrogation unit might have come in handy.

So it was with great interest that I listened to President Obama, during the State of the Union Address, tell us that:

(Transcript from FoxNews) – … we will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America.

And the only thing I hear is “So it is written, so it shall be done!”

My bet, he hasn’t clue one how to accomplish this, will not even do anything more than talk about it or form some commission to talk about it, and will continue on his current path of reshaping our economy into the image of “fairness” that he believes is what America should be all about:  a dependency on huge government that will be tougher addiction to kick than tobacco and as damaging as sniffing glue as we evolve to a nation of drones with no real incentive to innovate because any rewards will be taxed (literally) to death to support a government infrastructure that will be designed to ensure a voting block that must keep Democrats in office to maintain the steady fix of free money.

May not be written, but certainly will be done…  unless we restore some balance of power in November.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share
 

Money Laundering Chicago Style

January 26th, 2010

Was chatting about politics tonight during a long drive and one of the folks in our discussion made an interesting observation.

While there is populist support for punishing the banks who accepted tax dollars during the bail outs and continue to pay out big bonuses, we appear to be witnessing yet another political shell game from this administration.

This anger that President Obama is tapping into as a means to levy a special tax on these banks is blinding us to what is really going on here.

Think about it.

First they take tax dollars and pump the money into the banks to prop them up.  At the same time, nothing is done to restrict bonus pay outs; in fact, maybe nothing can be done if these are contractual obligations.

Next, as bonuses are handed out, demonize the evil bankers who are taking taxpayer money and putting it in their own pockets (a right reserve for politicians).

Then, levy a special tax to punish the bankers and get back some of those tax dollars.  But… this money isn’t the same money we gave the banks.

Oh no, this is a special tax that can be used to fund other programs.  If this tax hurts the banks to the point where they can not repay what they owe, well that would be unfortunate indeed.  But you can’t expect us to pay back tax payers with this tax, the two are unrelated.  Why your money is still owed to you by the banks… talk to them about it.

Pretty straight forward money laundering.

Our money goes into the banks, “tax” money comes out, a nice new revenue stream for whatever program the Dems want to support (I heard one actually pushing for the money to go directly from this tax to Haiti).  What happened to our money?

Don’t look at us, ask the evil bankers.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It!

Share